How much of it actually fell? I heard one report it was 4 sections, but how much is a section? Just curious!It's deceiving because the bridge runs a ways inland before it has an exit. There were a few sections that came down on the North shore.
How much of it actually fell? I heard one report it was 4 sections, but how much is a section? Just curious!It's deceiving because the bridge runs a ways inland before it has an exit. There were a few sections that came down on the North shore.
No, it's just deceiving panthera; that was an inland section that came down on the freight train.I looked at the satellite view and the RR tracks that I saw on the map can't be where the freight train was that got crushed under the bridge. They're just too far from the river, so there must be another track. I could get a better idea if I knew which direction the semi-truck & bus were headed ~ toward downtown or away from there?
Try to find one of the overhead photos; it should give us a better perspective as to where the tracks are, with respect to the section on the train cars.How much of it actually fell? I heard one report it was 4 sections, but how much is a section? Just curious!![]()
Oh I see. I agree about finding an aerial photo of the collapse to figure it out. Seeing it on tv, from eye level, it is deceiving because I can't see the "whole picture" at once.No, it's just deceiving panthera; that was an inland section that came down on the freight train.
I just turned on the CNN special and saw the video of the collapse again. Still looking for an aerial photo though!They are sending a five man Navy Assessment Team.
I saw Geraldo last night too. I don't remember the name either, but I hope Geraldo or someone does make sure this is investigated.I saw it on Geraldo....so go consider the source...but last night they talked about a Deputy D someone...they did mention his name...which switched from the current Minnesota Dept of Trans. to the current company working on this very project. It seems all of the oversight on keeping up with the current status of the bridge went away when they began their work a few weeks ago. They want it investigated. So do I.
I never watch Geraldo; he has a bad habit of saying things that are greatly exaggerated, and even untrue.Geraldo is going through prior reports about problems with the bridge, specifically with hinge joints in span #2 dating back to 1994.![]()
This time he was showing the report on tv and talking with an "expert". Oh well, who knows! It's hard to imagine that something that caused concern in 1994 and assuming it wasn't repaired would last until 2007 for the bridge to collapse. There is new video that was interesting though!I never watch Geraldo; he has a bad habit of saying things that are greatly exaggerated, and even untrue.
RR, I was looking for a recent satellite image showing the damage.This one is better for viewing where the train-tracks are.
RR, I was looking for a recent satellite image showing the damage.