Found Safe WI - Audrey Good Backeberg, 20, Reedsburg, 7 July 1962

she simply walked away from her life
In a report filed on July 4, 1962 by Audrey Backeberg to the Reedsburg Police Department, Ronald threatened to kill her and had two loaded guns in the trunk of his car.
(...) According to records, Audrey said she was beaten so badly that she had to go to the hospital just days before she left.
(...) Isaac Hanson, a detective with the Sauk County Sheriff's Office, said.
"She had concerns about her own personal safety with some abuse that she had reported to the Reedsburg Police Department."

I wonder what THAT means:

At one point in 1964, investigators determined Audrey left on her own free will and did not want to be found.

Source:

This is all super weird to me. Dozen on dozen of cases where spouse looks super guilty but nothing really happens for long years or even decades and everyone is like oh he/she was such a nice guy/gal, I can't believe he/she killed their spouse and kept the body under gazeboo.

Then here, with a whitness who not only heard or saw but accompanied Audrey while she was running away, while having pretty good reasons to leave that life behind (abuse and death threats) husband was allegedly grilled hard about her alleged murder and remained a strong suspect - despite of the fact that in 1964 investigators determined Audrey left on her own free will and did not want to be found?! I don't understand it.

That's really sad. My heart goes out to her loved ones. I wonder if she even reached out to family?
I hope she didn't. Husband was 100% sure he haven't murdered her, but was aggressive towards her, threatened her, assaulted her ("allegedly").
Two possibilities: first - he was a psycho, sadistic monster who abused everyone in his life (pretty unlikely cause she left the kids with him), second - he was young and immature, abusive (but not to the level of murdering anyone) and frustrated with the marriage, extremely angry with Audrey at the time... and he knew he didn't kill her. What he knew was that he got left with two young children to raise on his own, with people judging him for the assaults, suspecting him of a murder, with cops interested in him...
Not to be judgemental but I wouldn't be surprised if he was e x t r e m e l y angry with Audrey for his whole life resulting with children hating her dead or alive.
 
In a report filed on July 4, 1962 by Audrey Backeberg to the Reedsburg Police Department, Ronald threatened to kill her and had two loaded guns in the trunk of his car.
(...) According to records, Audrey said she was beaten so badly that she had to go to the hospital just days before she left.
(...) Isaac Hanson, a detective with the Sauk County Sheriff's Office, said.
"She had concerns about her own personal safety with some abuse that she had reported to the Reedsburg Police Department."

I wonder what THAT means:

At one point in 1964, investigators determined Audrey left on her own free will and did not want to be found.

Source:


This is all super weird to me. Dozen on dozen of cases where spouse looks super guilty but nothing really happens for long years or even decades and everyone is like oh he/she was such a nice guy/gal, I can't believe he/she killed their spouse and kept the body under gazeboo.

Then here, with a whitness who not only heard or saw but accompanied Audrey while she was running away, while having pretty good reasons to leave that life behind (abuse and death threats) husband was allegedly grilled hard about her alleged murder and remained a strong suspect - despite of the fact that in 1964 investigators determined Audrey left on her own free will and did not want to be found?! I don't understand it.


I hope she didn't. Husband was 100% sure he haven't murdered her, but was aggressive towards her, threatened her, assaulted her ("allegedly").
Two possibilities: first - he was a psycho, sadistic monster who abused everyone in his life (pretty unlikely cause she left the kids with him), second - he was young and immature, abusive (but not to the level of murdering anyone) and frustrated with the marriage, extremely angry with Audrey at the time... and he knew he didn't kill her. What he knew was that he got left with two young children to raise on his own, with people judging him for the assaults, suspecting him of a murder, with cops interested in him...
Not to be judgemental but I wouldn't be surprised if he was e x t r e m e l y angry with Audrey for his whole life resulting with children hating her dead or alive.

I have to wonder if some of it had to do with her home life prior to the marriage. There was a Reddit comment that mentioned while her parents were separated, prior to their divorce, some years later, her father pulled (shot?) a gun at his soon to be ex-wife. Sounds like Audrey's father has a violent temper. What would she be coming back to in 1964, a marriage she was still stuck in, parents that wouldn't want her back in the house? The "own free will and did not want to be found" comment implies someone knew where she was!

Again, poor kids, ending up with a complex already because mom deserted them, and I'm sure they heard how bad she (mom) was from dad and his side of the family, and how bad he (dad) was from mom's side of the family. The living daughter is what, in her 60s, hopefully is in a better space about this after all this time, to have it stirred up yet again. Oy.

Somebody needs to write a book about this from all perspectives. I'd read it!
 
I can empathise with her making the decisions she did. How many times do we see family annihilator crimes from males who can’t stand the thought of losing their wife and kids. Perhaps she thought that if she took the kids with her then he would be determined to seek her out (and they would all be in danger) whereas if it was just her leaving and he got to keep the kids then everyone would be more likely to stay safe and he would be less likely to come looking for her. We don’t know all the details but we know he was allegedly very violent to the point she clearly feared for her life. I doubt she made the decision to leave her kids behind lightly.
 
I can empathise with her making the decisions she did. How many times do we see family annihilator crimes from males who can’t stand the thought of losing their wife and kids. Perhaps she thought that if she took t,he kids with her then he would be determined to seek her out (and they would all be in danger) whereas if it was just her leaving and he got to keep the kids then everyone would be more likely to stay safe and he would be less likely to come looking for her. We don’t know all the details but we know he was allegedly very violent to the point she clearly feared for her life. I doubt she made the decision to leave her kids behind lightly.
Took the kids where? She was 20, with two little children. Unlikely that she had a lot of savings and it would cost a lot to be on a run with children so young. How to get a job and earn some money while keeping them safe, fed and healthy? Next to impossible task, especially in '62. Also cops would surely look much much harder for her if she'd disappear with kids.

If husband was never abusive towards their children and had close, supportive family that was likely not only the best but kind of only option for her to get out of it alive.
Another thing is that husband could have no plans of killing her but it surely does sound like he wouldnt be first to jump in and help her if there was someone else threatening her in case of divorce or separation. He looks like the one obviously responsible for everything, but it was unclear for the family as to when exactly Audrey went missing. Possilby she was trying to find some help and support locally but realized that it wont happen, possibly the husband wasn't the only one she feared of.
 

Audrey Fey, 82, formerly known as Audrey Backeberg, was found alive in Kentucky after a two-month investigation led by the Sauk County Sheriff’s Det. Isaac Hanson.

In his report, Hanson said, Fey asked whether Backeberg was still alive and expressed no remorse about his death, nor that of her mother. Fey said that she and her siblings were never close.

Hanson also told Fey of the death of their son, James, in 1990 in Kendall, and noted the couple’s other child, a daughter, still lives in Sauk County. After Fey fled, James went to live with Ronald’s parents and their daughter went to live with Audrey’s parents.
 
There but for the Grace of God go I,
I find that WISC article posted ^ to be written with a slanted tone;
Mine is a life where I haven’t felt the imperative to run.
How fortunate am I? How fortunate are we?
I hope reporters stop opportunistically doxxing an 82yo woman with past abuse for clicks.
 
<modsnip - quoted post was removed (not victim friendly>

Well, I do believe she was abused by her husband, and the babysitter confirmed it. Plus Audrey had made complaints to the police about it, and also she was too young to get married and have kids. Her husband should have never asked to wed someone who was 15. Yes, I do agree she should have just left him and made arrangements with her family/relatives to help look after the two children growing up, but that can't be changed now unfortunately.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<modsnip - quoted post was removed (not victim friendly>

She fiIed a formal claim. I don't believe a 20-year-old, married at only 15, would file a made-up claim of domestic violence. It all fits with grooming and abuse. She didn't want custody of her children nor have a motive to make a false claim. She just wanted to get away from him. I do think she was "fleeing for her life." JMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I do agree she should have just left him and made arrangements with her family/relatives to help look after the two children growing up, but that can't be changed now unfortunately.
What arrangements?
Let's say I'm 20yo with 2 little kids, married since 15. My husband attacked me and threatened me. Possibly it was just one time thing, possibly he has no plans of hurting me - but I don't know that, I can't be sure of it, Im afraid for my safety and my family agreed for me to wed at 15, I'm not close to my family, and it's 1962. So likely I have no support.
What arrangements can I make to make sure I'll be safe, that we will get a peaceful divorce and I'll be able to co-parent with my ex?

Some people got married pretty young and loved each other for long long years but more often than not such marriage was just an attempt to get out of a bad family situation. There could be not much of an option for her to make any arrangements without being constantly abused.

<modsnip - quoted post was removed (not victim friendly)>

Somehow neither her family or her husband were able to say when exactly was she seen last time. That's pretty good indicator that they either didn't knew the person well or didn't care, or with some reason weren't able to know what was going on - one way or another: not the most reliable sources of info about the reality of what she was struggling with (not even implying any ill will or neglect, just lack of ability to tell with honest confidence of knowing).

<modsnip - quoted post was removed (not victim friendly)>

There was a whitness of her leaving and being far away from home and rather quick conclusion from the investigators that she left on her own accord.

<modsnip - quoted post was removed (not victim friendly>
She didn't left "her" kids with him, they were their kids, his kids as well.
Plenty of people are abusive towards partners but never towards their kids.
Plenty of grandparents dont have much of a connection with their kids but they adore grandchildren and act completely different towards them.
He could have strong family bond with parents and siblings while she didn't.
And he could be not the main/only reason why she feared for her safety.
She fiIed a formal claim. I don't believe a 20-year-old, married at only 15, would file a made-up claim of domestic violence. It all fits with grooming and abuse. She didn't want custody of her children nor have a motive to make a false claim. She just wanted to get away from him. I do think she was "fleeing for her life." JMO.
Maybe not neccessarily grooming - could be but could be not, cause he wasnt much older but for me it doesnt feel like they fell in love, got married and grew apart while growing up. Maybe she or even both of them were pressured to marry, then expected to stay together no matter what. Ive heard about some pretty horrible marriages from back in the day where there was no "baby on the way" kind of pressure but kids were forced to marry with other "reasons" and getting a divorce wasnt an option.

We dont know how it really was but that would be some seriously rare situation if it was like he never acted violently once, but she was such a villain princess she made up that claim, filed false report and disappeared to make it look like he murdered her so he'd suffer from endless suspicions. Such things doesnt come out of the blue, most made-up claims are made by people who are mentally ill (and its unavoidably getting worse and worse with age) or by pathological liars who are no evil masterminds and bit of decent investigation makes it clear that there is quite big of a chance that claim may be made-up.

Really no need for the husband to be some kind of sadistic abusive monster. It could be even one time thing with nothing more than an anger talk. Lets say it was like that, its still a loveless marriage at that point. With no strong family bond, with the past of being wed at 15 in the community (i checked out some more random Graves at the local cemetery and most people were marrying around the age of 20, as in the family of her SIL). She was much younger than other brides, he was much younger than basically all the grooms as well. Whatever led to such an early marriage i cant image the tensions around it were anywhere close to light and i dont mean that her husband caused them. It didn't have to be all on him that she feared for her life. Starting a new life with nothing its far from an easy task and nobody does that without a good reason.

And i probably shouldnt say that, but young princess of evil mastermind, who does not see any serious threat in her family/community/social circle with a husband who wasnt violent towards her once and never threatened her with anything, having cops eating up her fake abuse stories most likely would not leave. Why leave? Itd be perfect environment to thrive and manipulate her way to whatever she wished to get. Even if her wish would be leaving everything and everone behind, taking divorce papers, all her legal documments, clothes and her other stuff, money, car and kids on the back seat. Or without the kids if she wouldnt feel like it. Cause thats what people with ill will and no threats do, or at least are trying to do.
Most of average folks who are not in any sort of extreme situation are just getting a divorce, some support from family, friends or/and the community, often even from their soon-to-be-ex-spouse and then they work their way into another chapter of their lives, co-parenting with their exes as much and as good as they can. Cause thats the easy way out of a failed marriage. If thats possible nobody makes it harder for themselves just to have it harder or make somebody elses life harder in a weird way - that could happen if some mental issues are coming into play, but then again: it doesnt come away without treatment, it unvoidably keeps repeating and escalating. It doesnt sound like it did in her case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The whole situation is understandable and very sad, but it's also sad she wanted to go have fun and not be a mother according to the babysitter. It's true a 2 year old wouldn't remember her, but a 4 year old would. I believe it was her son who was 4. At the time, I would think they both noticed her absence.

That's long in the past, though. What seems sadder to me is that she probably won't connect with her living daughter or even any descendents of her son, if any. She could afraid of her daughter being upset with her, understandably, or of her daughter not wanting to reconnect. Her daughter may not want to reconnect, either. Without knowing the personalities of everyone involved, it is hard to say. I can understand her not wanting to have any contact with her siblings, etc.

Perhaps having any contact with her daughter, if her daughter is interested, would just be too overwhelming for her at this point. It sounds like what she should have done as a teenager, if she was pregnant before she married, is give the child up for adoption. But possibly her family wouldn't let her. It could be it was only later or after she had two kids that she realized she didn't feel able to be a mother so young, though. What was the date of her and Ronald's marriage? I couldn't find it.
 
The whole situation is understandable and very sad, but it's also sad she wanted to go have fun and not be a mother according to the babysitter. It's true a 2 year old wouldn't remember her, but a 4 year old would. I believe it was her son who was 4. At the time, I would think they both noticed her absence.

That's long in the past, though. What seems sadder to me is that she probably won't connect with her living daughter or even any descendents of her son, if any. She could afraid of her daughter being upset with her, understandably, or of her daughter not wanting to reconnect. Her daughter may not want to reconnect, either. Without knowing the personalities of everyone involved, it is hard to say. I can understand her not wanting to have any contact with her siblings, etc.

Perhaps having any contact with her daughter, if her daughter is interested, would just be too overwhelming for her at this point. It sounds like what she should have done as a teenager, if she was pregnant before she married, is give the child up for adoption. But possibly her family wouldn't let her. It could be it was only later or after she had two kids that she realized she didn't feel able to be a mother so young, though. What was the date of her and Ronald's marriage? I couldn't find it.

Audrey (15) and Ron (17) were married August 17, 1957 per The Reedsburg TImes-Press. Son James was born March 1958 per his Find a Grave memorial.

To be honest, if this were my mother, I'd have no desire to meet / reconcile with her after all this time.
 

Audrey Fey, 82, formerly known as Audrey Backeberg, was found alive in Kentucky after a two-month investigation led by the Sauk County Sheriff’s Det. Isaac Hanson.

In his report, Hanson said, Fey asked whether Backeberg was still alive and expressed no remorse about his death, nor that of her mother. Fey said that she and her siblings were never close.

Hanson also told Fey of the death of their son, James, in 1990 in Kendall, and noted the couple’s other child, a daughter, still lives in Sauk County. After Fey fled, James went to live with Ronald’s parents and their daughter went to live with Audrey’s parents.
Do you have a link that isn't paywalled?
 
Ive heard about some pretty horrible marriages from back in the day where there was no "baby on the way" kind of pressure but kids were forced to marry with other "reasons" and getting a divorce wasnt an option.
I've certainly known couples like this, and the most common reason was because they lived in a time and place where there was an unwritten rule that if a girl had a boyfriend when she graduated from high school, they were to get married even if she wasn't pregnant, or they just plain old didn't want to.
 
Sometimes people can remember things from when they were 2, I should add. Those memories can be dim to very dim, but there. I know I can, although it may only be one memory and it is dim. Of course, it's also true that some people may not be able to remember stuff from when they were 4 or at least not very well. It does vary from person to person.
 
I don't understand what is going on here.
So she left her life 63 years ago (almost) and it really was, for at least 60 years it was clear for the investigators that she wasn't murdered but left and isn't interested in coming back, she wasn't hiding at all... but fairy recently her sister asked investigators to "TRACK HER DOWN"?! So she hasn't asked them to reopen the case, to investigate it again... just to track her down... sixty years later?
Then what's about all these articles? Did Audrey really agreed on sharing this story and her picture?

Abusive towards the children too? Affair with her mother? Dear God, Napoleon could fail to figure out how to navigate that situation. Leaving everything behind and blocking everything behind could just feel like the lesser evil.
 
Post-partum depression and anxiety were so poorly understood and treated back then.
Were they at all? Understood or treated? On that missing person picture she looks so skinny and exhausted. Her statements sound rough, very rough, but "not caring" often sounds exactly like "trying to cope in best way possible".
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
3,975
Total visitors
4,106

Forum statistics

Threads
623,826
Messages
18,472,825
Members
240,552
Latest member
BushChookz
Back
Top