You know I am really shocked at what the therapist has said about the drawings. I've been thinking about that all day. Did the therapist know about the childcollection? The
is a crime. And
collection has been connected to child molestations statistically. A drawing takes that one step further in that it actively involves the person in the
/child image so I would guess that would be one step further down the line, closer to actual involvement with a child. And what did he use for models for those pics he drew?
How many other persons does that therapist have who has an "innocent"collection that isn't getting reported?
I am with you mysteriew: I have been researching this most of today. And I ABHOR these cases, imo, there is Nothing, and I mean Nothing, worse than a pedophile. Your questions are right on, I try to give the benefit of the doubt to the shrink, as in, perhaps she was misquoted, but the more I hear, the more I think:
There is witnesses that he was active in young boys missing cases dated back to 1989-1992 for sure. JW missing 89' , Dunhill, map found in home, 91.
There are multiple witnesses with that "nice guy but creepy" extending back 20 years.
A break in occurred in 2003 ( allegedly,his account, I have my doubts and think it may be related to an abduction.) and the front door still yields the sign about it, "infared camera".
I am very open to correction, but this guy has quantified his age group for young boys in every way. The chances of him NOT ever offending are non-existant based on every profile I could find.
Neighbor says house on Conway boarded because he was going to be moving back to Momma's house in Racine.. I am thinking the dirt piles and the fresh concrete are because something was moved in anticipation of that.
JMHO