AMBER ALERT WI - Jayme Closs, 13, Barron, missing after parents found shot, 15 Oct 2018 *endangered* #31

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,081
How reliable is the radaronline website? I've always been curious why law enforcement refused to let the Closs' family hear the 911 call, but this website mentions that via the call you can hear Jayme screaming for help -- which could be a shock for the family.

However, IMO, this also means the call is a little more clear than is being claimed.
 
  • #1,082
How reliable is the radaronline website? I've always been curious why law enforcement refused to let the Closs' family hear the 911 call, but this website mentions that via the call you can hear Jayme screaming for help -- which could be a shock for the family.

However, IMO, this also means the call is a little more clear than is being claimed.
Radar makes DailyMail look like Reuters...
 
  • #1,083
  • #1,084
  • #1,085
I believe this was asked of the sheriff and I think it was in the Dryden interview. I believe he said they followed up on it and acted as if they had dismissed it. I can't swear to it however.
Yeah, I don’t remember exactly either, but I think it was that they weren’t “keen” on it right now. :rolleyes:
 
  • #1,086
Before anyone even decides that is what I meant, it is not in any way what I meant. I am talking about the news orgs, not LE messing with it. And there was an unredacted one released and I always wondered if it was meant to be and after that, some news sites did redact certain things off of that one. Then there was a redacted one released. And some news orgs simply retyped entries themselves in their reporting or so it looked.

It's a pdf file of scanned images. No one is going to easily change those. There is no typing here.

(A fan, ilovechili, but I don't think this dog will hunt...)
 
  • #1,087
  • #1,088
i brought up this possibility early on. i was wondering if it was supposed to be 7 minutes AHEAD and not behind. 12:45 would make more sense of course. i don't think there was further discussion of it because people were telling me no, it would've been 12:31 and no one else was questioning it so i accepted that i missed the source for it somewhere and just moved on.

How early? :) I discussed this a couple of times many threads ago -- I believe I also referenced this earlier in this very thread.

As I've said, I'm not sold on the timeline and believe the "7 minutes off" could be +7 instead of -7. It's been discussed.
 
  • #1,089
  • #1,090
It's a pdf file of scanned images. No one is going to easily change those. There is no typing here.

(A fan, ilovechili, but I don't think this dog will hunt...)
Huh? - nevermind... in before your edit. :)
 
  • #1,091
  • #1,092
i brought up this possibility early on. i was wondering if it was supposed to be 7 minutes AHEAD and not behind. 12:45 would make more sense of course. i don't think there was further discussion of it because people were telling me no, it would've been 12:31 and no one else was questioning it so i accepted that i missed the source for it somewhere and just moved on.
Ok well... 2 of us agree.. :)
 
  • #1,093
How early? :) I discussed this a couple of times many threads ago -- I believe I also referenced this earlier in this very thread.

As I've said, I'm not sold on the timeline and believe the "7 minutes off" could be +7 instead of -7. It's been discussed.

Most people set their bedroom clocks ahead not behind. If set ahead as most do, (to be early rather than late) then it would be -7. We may never know but it is pretty hard to believe the neighbors don't know if they have checked the clock even once since, whether it is ahead or behind :) It makes far more sense to me that it was set ahead. Which leaves the same old issues with these gunshots and when they were heard, if they were heard and how it fits in.
 
  • #1,094
How early? :) I discussed this a couple of times many threads ago -- I believe I also referenced this earlier in this very thread.

As I've said, I'm not sold on the timeline and believe the "7 minutes off" could be +7 instead of -7. It's been discussed.
i think pretty much right when it came out...and totally possible i missed subsequent discussions and theories about it. hard to keep up with all the threads! and i've also signed off for a few days here and there since it can get frustrating and just continuously heartbreaking with nothing new coming out.
 
  • #1,095
i think pretty much right when it came out...and totally possible i missed subsequent discussions and theories about it. hard to keep up with all the threads! and i've also signed off for a few days here and there since it can get frustrating and just continuously heartbreaking with nothing new coming out.

Same here and understood. Impossible to follow all these threads!
 
  • #1,096
Most people set their bedroom clocks ahead not behind. If set ahead as most do, (to be early rather than late) then it would be -7. We may never know but it is pretty hard to believe the neighbors don't know if they have checked the clock even once since, whether it is ahead or behind :) It makes far more sense to me that it was set ahead. Which leaves the same old issues with these gunshots and when they were heard, if they were heard and how it fits in.
I gave up trying to make sense of this timeline. What still bothers me is that this is the only thing (that we know of) that resembles any form of having witnesses, yet it seems to have just been discarded. If it’s because they just gave up trying to figure it out, I’m not sure how excited we should be about the rest of the investigation. *shrug*
 
  • #1,097
I gave up trying to make sense of this timeline. What still bothers me is that this is the only thing (that we know of) that resembles any form of having witnesses, yet it seems to have just been discarded. If it’s because they just gave up trying to figure it out, I’m not sure how excited we should be about the rest of the investigation. *shrug*

Pretty much sums it up. There really isn't anything. One neighbor's account (which seems not to fit). We had the cars for awhile, they seem discarded as well. Frustrating and heartbreaking as a few others just said.
 
  • #1,098
Thank you. You did not give a hint which one out of 140 pages lol but I found NWAR pretty quickly considering. Page 19 if anyone else wants to look (in numbered pages), I think it was page 23 overall. I appreciate you providing this.
Well the whole thing is fun reading, right?
 
  • #1,099
Yeah - brown jacket interview, right? That’s because we slipped you shrooms instead of LSD. :D



Brown jacket, or tan pullover hoodie?
 
  • #1,100
Well the whole thing is fun reading, right?

lol, actually I skimmed a bit of it and i think it is a worthwhile manual to save for future use and reference. i mean that seriously, thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
2,551
Total visitors
2,681

Forum statistics

Threads
632,208
Messages
18,623,537
Members
243,057
Latest member
persimmonpi3
Back
Top