BBM:
I've been thinking about this ever since you made the point.
Why would his mind go to abduction vs. accident?
Surely, a car accident would be the most likely explanation given the circumstances, which according to him were not out of the ordinary. Also, they were both supposedly last seen on camera in the SUV, per his reports.
Which should further indicate a car accident as the most likely explanation for them being missing.
There was nothing amiss at the house, according to him.
So why this immediate leap to the abduction scenario?
Such low probability of that being the case...and this guy saying he's "a problem-solver."
Again, it's incongruous.
Troubling.
JMO.