Maybe he really did think that she would not divorce him no matter what?
As for divorce being stigmatized, especially for women, at least in my neck of the woods, that sure isn't true. Nowadays, it seems that when a woman is getting a divorce, whether everyone saw it coming or not, everyone basically throws confetti at her. I've even seen posts, and letters to advice columnists, that purported to be from women who were divorcing, and they were NOT happy about it. Or they knew it was necessary, because neither of them were happy, that kind of thing, but they didn't think it was anything to celebrate.
Whatever happened, I'm at least glad he didn't annihilate his family first.
Honestly, no one can prevent a person from getting a divorce in a secular country.
The problem is, Ryan was a total financial loser. This with living where he was born and raised. He had the community supporting him, his mom’s and dad’s families, his wife’s family, his wife and kids…and was totally going downhill financially. A divorce is not possible given the situation. Another woman is not possible, either.
So call it a fugue - when people disappear, leave all their lives behind and start anew. Only it was a nasty fugue because he put his family in a horrible situation.
The fact that his older son was barely talking to him?
I understand the guy. It usually happens to fathers who are “bad providers”. Some are bad providers but great dads, but if Ryan was spending all days in his shop, not spending quality time with the children and bringing home no money, what’s there to expect? His kids can’t afford the things they need, and it doesn’t foster respect to the dad.
I strongly believe that in our day and age, both spouses should be working. Life is too insecure. But - you can’t demand a mother raising three kids to work. So Ryan should have planned his family better. Either “I don’t have any marketable skills so my spouse has to work, too. Hence, one kid is the maximum”. Or “I have to get really good marketable skills”. Or if she disagrees and says that she wants to be a stay at home mom only, and he knows that he can’t support “a traditional family”, then get the divorce before you have four people to support.
ETA: in our day and age, ten years younger, he’d be in the group of guys complaining online that he can’t find a woman because they are golddiggers. He’d be probably living with the parents and it is true, no woman would need an immature, financially insecure guy. The reason he ended up in a different situation - married, with own house, a wife and a family, is because he never moved away from his town. And, because he attended his church.
So, I am a secular person, but let us be honest, having a support group and own community helps. In a big city, he’d be declared dead, case closed, and who cares what dangerous situation he’d get into, and where? And his family would have to move in with the wife’s parents because he stole from them.
Blaming his wife for being religious or not talking to him is unfair - the only reason he has a wife is because he never moved away from the tiny community he grew up in. And he is lucky that she wants to stay by the marriage given what he’s done to her and the kids.