K_Z
Verified Anesthetist
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,657
- Reaction score
- 2,507
I don't understand why the Z's haven't viewed the hospital videos since they are the ones looking for evidence that DS left the hospital and didn't return until a certain time. I would have been all over them (or had one of the Z defenders in SD do it) once they became public domain.
Where are you finding that the Zahaus have NOT viewed them?
This below is from the Federal case (Documents 64-1, 11 pages). I think we can safely conclude that the Zahau's and their attorney Greer know exactly where the 27 surveillance CDs are, and HAVE definitely reviewed the surveillance. Page 3 of document 64-1 state that all the evidence held by SDSO and Coronado PD has been produced to BOTH parties, and the rest is available in evidence storage to BOTH parties for review and analysis.
It was this document filed in the Federal case that confirmed for all of us, the public following the case, that the Rady surveillance actually still existed and WAS preserved and available to BOTH sides.
Dina's attorneys, in this filing, were trying to compel the Zahau attorneys to turn over whatever they found in their review of the surveillance videos. IIRC, Greer basically said whatever we found is our personal work product, and is privileged, and then discussed again where the surveillance is being kept, and how the defendants could go look at it themselves at their convenience.
The whole point was that there was no need for Dina's claims for a "federal subpoena", because the originals were (and ARE) available to BOTH the plaintiffs and defense.
Defendant Dina Shacknai argues that the surveillance taken by Rady Childrens Hospital the night Rebecca Zahau was killed will establish that she was not at the scene of the hanging, and that it is being held by the Department of Justice. However, the 27 CDs from Radys Childrens Hospital were produced to the Coronado Police Department pursuant to subpoena, and are currently held as Item 10 in the Coronado Police Departments evidence storage. (Greer Decl., ¶ 5, pg.3). Although Defendant argues that state court processes to obtain the disks have been futile, there is no evidence submitted to support the argument.
BBM.
Here is a link to Carioca's post #94, from 4-07-15. The PACER federal documents are imaged there. Please read document 64-1, which is the memorandum by Attorney Greer opposing Dina's opposition to stay the proceedings in the Federal case. It's pretty clear that the Rady surveillance is available to both parties at their convenience-- no subpoenas needed. They simply have to go there to see it.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-2013-in-California-3&p=11663295#post11663295
ETA: In fact, now that I re-read 64-1, and the attached exhibit C, it's clear that it will be possible to construct a visual aid displaying all of the defendants entries and exits at Rady. The evidence subpoenaed includes all surveillance from one hour before Max was admitted Monday, June 11, 2011, thru 8:00 am Wednesday, June 13. It is possible to track the entries and exits of each of the defendants. I'm confident the Zahau attorneys have done just that.
And there is no gag order in this case. Either side could leak or publicize the findings on those surveillance CDs, or any other evidence. We already know the sheriff stated Dina is not seen on surveillance during the time in question. So there's no need for the Zahaus to re-iterate that. If the Sheriff wasn't correct, it's up to Dina and her attorneys to correct that in the public. Otherwise, the public is probably going to believe the Sheriff's statements that she isn't there.