Misssophia1
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2019
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 221
From a family member of aubrees to bf
From a family member of aubrees to bf
From a family member of aubrees to bf
Still confused. About what, and what does it have to do with her disappearance?
Still confused. About what, and what does it have to do with her disappearance?
Perhaps. But if she was that freaked out why didn't he tell her to stay put and offer to drive over and have her follow him back so she didn't get lost again...I know it was a long drive, but if you love someone...
Alibi?Perhaps. But if she was that freaked out why didn't he tell her to stay put and offer to drive over and have her follow him back so she didn't get lost again...I know it was a long drive, but if you love someone... Either way she was not going to arrive at the sheriff's office for at least 3 hours and he would have had cell service anywhere he went in town, why would you just sit there in a truck, in front of the sheriff's office, on camera for 5.5 hours and then when she fails to return still not report her as missing, especially when your sitting in front of the sheriffs office. It doesn't make sense.
Several days ago:also curious if they can tell when exactly it was disabled. i'm not terribly familiar with OnStar (and am not techy at all) but it's a paid subscription right? if so they would have records of when payment ceased, if it did. If no request was made to stop the service then i'd think their records would also show at what point they were not able to make contact with the car anymore. ?? again, not all that familiar with OnStar so please correct me if i'm way off base.
As per my opinion the family member was prob"told off" as you say because of texts that said family member sent.. and in my opinion she was prob bailed out because of her kiddos and not anger towards her family.
I'm sorry, but as Aubree's family member I'm not sure I understand what you are referring to. We as a FAMILY chose not to bail her out after her latest arrest because WE felt like she might needed the time to reflect on her life's choices BECAUSE of her children. She had multiple family members ready and willing to help with the children while she worked through her problem. However, she was bailed out and no lesson was learned. So we are very confused as to what you are referring to and what information you think you have or know. As a family we love Aubree deeply and always will and miss her terribly. Unfortunately, she was making some bad choices that could have affected her and the children. Just because we chose not to bail her out of jail does not mean we love her any less! It appears that perhaps you only have one side of the story and for that I am sorry.
My understanding is that is correct. She had to be missing 24 hours. That is why Aubree's brother called to report her missing Saturday night, so hopefully LE would get on it Sunday morning as soon as she had been missing the 24 hours.Maybe LE did speak to him and when texts were shown to them they wouldnt place a missing persons report because she did contact someone...
Im sure you are very correct that they prob only had one side of the story.. and if person that wants bailed out lies about thier family then that is thier bad...
I agree. I'm so sorry we are all confused!
also curious if they can tell when exactly it was disabled. i'm not terribly familiar with OnStar (and am not techy at all) but it's a paid subscription right? if so they would have records of when payment ceased, if it did. If no request was made to stop the service then i'd think their records would also show at what point they were not able to make contact with the car anymore. ?? again, not all that familiar with OnStar so please correct me if i'm way off base.
In my opinion this is a very big mess... right from the start! And i know that everyone wants aubree found... it is very sad that it seems both family's might have had major misunderstandings right from the start