..they were then asked by the Appeals Court, to provide them with a copy of the transcript of the sentencing hearing, rather than just the sentencing order.
..they just asked on monday for a little more time to get that to them----request was granted.
..also---------you will recall at the sentencing hearing ---PRE-sentencing, lisabethF read off a whole lot of blah di blah case law this, case law that........(finally) ending with "it's therefore our position this was ONE lie, and not 4."
..judgeP asked her a few questions....then he went on his computer (for quite a few minutes) came back, cited HIS case law this, case law that------determined it WAS 4 seperate lies and sentenced her to each of the 4.
..their appeal------nope, we still say it's ONE---------what do YOU say District Court of Appeal ???
Yes, LF did argue that and got nowhere BUT CM, tilted his hand, today. He is now saying that the felon cannot be charged with lying to LE in the case of a murder investigation and that LE knew that the felon was lying about Caylee being missing, kidnapped, abducted. So, by default she was lying to LE about a murder investigation and not about a missing person. This is how they will try to get the entire sentence appealed ...he showed his hand in the cost of investigation hearing, 9/2/2011.
For her DT team it is all about legal maneuvering, loop holes, and semantics. It is a game to them and has been for three plus years.