WildHuncher
Certified Insane Amateur
- Joined
- May 8, 2010
- Messages
- 669
- Reaction score
- 5,160
I got excited. (Sigh!)
(WARNING, GRAPHIC)WARNING: Don't get excited. THIS IS NOT RA's DOCKET !!!!
just another adjacent-player ...
View attachment 500294
Woodhouse trial was scheduled for May 13th as well, a conflict for the RA Prosecution.
So ... someone had to delay or plea and ... turns out ... it wasn't RA.
(Woodhouse also being the party that received RA's Defense outline via erroneous email sent to BW instead of Brad Rozzi. And Woodhouse sued Delphi re civil rights violations ... and won.)
... and then back to jail with BW ... for whatever the above plea is for ...
here's the case against Delphi:
Woodhouse v. Leazenby et al
I wonder if he wanted that motion sealed and filed it too fast?
I copied this for myself and excluded all the citations for easier reading. I'm kind of amazed how he spelled out all the things he's hoping to get excluded.
Number 7 piqued my interest.
Number 10 = so if any of the P's witnesses are lying liars, we dare not hear it?
1. Any comments about Counsel for the State that constitutes a personal attack on theMotion in Limine.pdf
drive.google.com
attorney for the State or comments on the role of the State’s attorney.
2. Any comment which constitutes the personal opinion of Defense Counsel about any
evidence, witness, outcome or penalty.
3. Any innuendo or inference that is not supported by admissible evidence.
4. Any attempt to indoctrinate the jury during voir dire by exposing the jury to
substantive issue in the case.
5. Any attempt during voir dire to have the jury pre-judge the credibility of a witness.
6. Any hypothetical questions that includes facts that are not in evidence or questions
that are not helpful in violation of Rule 705.
7. Any attempt to introduce evidence of 3rd party motive that is not relevant and/or the
probative value is outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or has the
potential to mislead the jury in violation of Rule 401.
8. Any reference to an investigation conducted by Todd Click, along with any reports or
investigative materials from Todd Click that is not relevant or is used for the purpose
of confusing the issues or has the potential to mislead the jury in violation of Rule 401.
9. Any reference to geofencing and/or any testimony from Kevin Horan about
geofencing or the findings from any geofence search that is not relevant or is for the
purpose of confusing the issues or has the potential to mislead the jury in violation of
Rule 401.
10. Any reference to any prior bad acts or acts of any witnesses that plan to testify at the
trial that is not relevant to what the Defendant is on trial for, that is not an act that is
an exception to IRE 404(b) and that is not both relevant under IRE 401 and tend to
negate the guilt of the Defendant.
11. Any reference to how the files were labeled that were handed over to the Defense as
part of the information and discovery provided to Defense Counsel by the State that
are not relevant or that would tend to cause confusion of the issues or has the
potential to mislead the jury in violation of Rule 401.
12. Any reference to any PowerPoints provided by the State as Executive Briefs
involving any person or persons that were investigated by law enforcement as part of
the 6 year investigation into the murder of Abigail Williams and Liberty German that
are not relevant or would tend to cause confusion of the issues or has the potential to
mislead the jury in violation of Rule 401.
A. Order the Defendant, through his counsel, and witnesses to refrain from mentioning,
commenting, or making any reference whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, to any of
the above matters without first obtaining permission of the Court outside the presence
and hearing of the jury;
B. To further order said persons to make no reference to the fact that this motion has
been filed and granted, and all other relief just and proper in the premises.
I've never been to a trial where coffee or water was allowed to spectators. For one thing, people have to get up and down for the bathroom frequently and it's disruptive. The noise and distraction of cups and bottles is an issue. Some leave their garbage on the floor or benches and there's more waste for the court to have to deal with. IMO, it's never a good idea. Court is serious business and should be treated so
Well that stinks. Thank you for responding!I wish! *pouts* Unfortunately not.
When I made the reference to the Turkish prison in Midnight Express it was a metaphor. Not so much anymore.(WARNING, GRAPHIC)
Pages behind here, thread moves fast!
My brain is stuck. In the motion the P listed names, ok. So...why would the P mention KAK or TK? Has anyone seen/heard where the defense mentioned KAK or TK? I realize the reason for this request is stopping the D from putting others on trial to deflect. Should the D bring up other possible actors, the D must show relevance. Wonder why those two names were included.
What is the purpose of not allowing even water or coffee for spectators? Is that normal in a courtroom? I've never attended a trial in person.
I think disruption is what she doesn't want. Remember what occurred last time in the courtroom and outside it, some disgraceful behavior. She can't stop them from attending (unless they act up) and not having cameras will ensure anyone's want of celebrity or outbursts in her courtroom won't end up on social media. JMO
We're talking Indiana, remember?Nick went ahead and scheduled two trials for the same day! How does their computer system even "allow" that?
Yeah, I suspect that has a lot to do with it.We're talking Indiana, remember?
I was wondering if the demand for a speedy trial came up after that was already scheduled.
S#it just got real.Jury Selection Orders, for May 13-16 Jury Selection (apparently in the) ALLEN COURTHOUSE.
Less than two weeks. It feels distinctly UNREAL to me. My brain seems to think this case will go on forever in limbo, like Waiting for Godot.S#it just got real.
Also court staff, and of course her majesty ... JG.Isn't the well just the attorneys and defendant?
Nick's busy.We're talking Indiana, remember?
I was wondering if the demand for a speedy trial came up after that was already scheduled.
Just a reminder of who Judge Francis Gull is.
She is more than the current trial, and the blatant and continuous disrespect for her is really unnecessary IMO.
Delphi murder trial: What to know about Judge Frances Gull
Judge Frances Gull has served Allen County's superior court since 1997. She's been re-elected four times. Gull has overseen six criminal courts, according to her Allen Superior Court biography page, and has served more than 20 years as the administrative judge of the superior court's criminal division.
I had high hopes for her.
I'll refrain from saying more since you will probably interpret it as disrespect, and you shared that you think disrespect of her is unnecessary.I don't know what that means.
She has accomplished so much during her career and I doubt it stops with this trial.