Hi Rosiebean,
That summation is, as I've stated in other posts, my opinion. It's based on the fact that Kyron's friend has said since the get-go that he saw Kyron, and his account appeared to be a quick conversation without the SM. Because LE kept saying that the SM was the last person to see Kyron, and the little boy's account seemed to say something different, I was concerned that his report was being discounted. Sorry, I don't remember exactly where I've posted on this, but if you click my name you can find all my posts.
I'm still worried about LE tunnel vision in this case, and so I'm very glad that the child's account is being discussed and that they're looking at that family's pictures of that day. I sure do want Kyron found--and a clean case to go to court.
I realize that the friend saw Kyron without TH, but...IMO...just because the friend didn't see TH doesn't mean she was not there. I've been to these kind of events....kids run ahead of their teachers and parents, and the interaction described by the friend was brief ("I'm going see this cool electronic exhibit"). TH could have been a step ahead or behind Kyron and the friend did not notice. Depending on what time he saw Kyron would tell LE if TH was there or not. For instance, if he told LE, "I saw Kyron alone right before the 8:25 warning bell" and a teacher told LE, "I was chatting quickly with TH in the hall when the 8:25 warning bell chimed"...well, you get that the friend might have seen Kyron without seeing TH.
From very early on in the investigation, LE indicated that they were talking to
everyone at the school, including kids, and that one of the reasons they weren't releasing specific information was so that they didn't influence impressionable minds. That alone told me that they were being very careful in talking to the kids and wanted to use the data gained from the kids in a meaningful way. IMO, just because LE's statements contradicted a 7-year-old's statement in no way meant they were overlooking it...it merely meant, IMO, that the 7-year-old did not have the full range of data that LE had.
The deskmate's saying that he saw Kyron in NO WAY discounts that TH was the last person to see Kyron. The kid might have seen Kyron but not TH (while many others saw TH during that same time). Also, someone might have seen Kyron and TH together well after the deskmate saw Kyron alone on his way to the electronic exhibit. The fact is, LE has said that TH is the last known person to have seen Kyron, and they were very firm about that. That statement...IMO...on its face does not negate the deskmate's statement...it merely puts it into context, again IMO.
Edited to add: they talked to the child in question well before this week and looked at their family pictures before this week. Again, this goes to how careful LE was to interview
everyone in the early days. I have seen nothing...IMO...that leads me to think that LE did
not take all witness accounts seriously.