Victoria Police Commissioner Shane Patton told media this afternoon that detectives questioned the man for more than 30 hours after he was taken into custody yesterday. He said police believed the murder was "a deliberate act" and "not a hit and runMy gut feeling is an initial accident around the boundary Rd / recreation road area, followed by a string of poor decisions. This intersection has a crest that obscures the intersection until its too late (loose gravel road, poor surface etc.)
You can get a fair amount of speed heading east along recreation road (potentially getting air over the crest, 50m before the intersection)
Then a panic, resulting in moving the body via boak road. Pause at the telstra tower and further planning there. Get caught on camera. Potentially wait for help.
Keep moving towards lal lal / Clarendon / Enfield. It's a ridiculous amount of area out there, with fire / motorbike tracks everywhere.
**edit: east along recreation rd
** I think I'm tending towards an initial accident out of self preservation. It's a more paletable feeling than 'Joe Nobody' waking up after a bender and deciding to attack someone. That horrifies me.
I tend to agree with you. IMHO - Coming home from God only knows where, possibly speeding, most likely with drugs and alcohol in his system, maybe on a suspended licence, and he accidently hits her. (pure coincidence it's at the halfway point of her run.) I'm guessing not hard enough, or in the right place, for there to be blood, just trauma. From here he panics. He sees his life disappear before him - parents ashamed and shun him, girlfriend leaves him, looses his job, looses status in the community. He can't risk that. She's clearly not dead yet (because of the murder, not manslaughter charge), maybe there's an argument, either way he "finishes her off". Maybe using tools from his car, or a nearby rock, or maybe even running over her again (less likely IMHO). From there, who knows? Was he alone in the car at this point? Did he call someone for physical assistance, or to get advice? Time will hopefully tell.My gut feeling is an initial accident around the boundary Rd / recreation road area, followed by a string of poor decisions. This intersection has a crest that obscures the intersection until its too late (loose gravel road, poor surface etc.)
You can get a fair amount of speed heading east along recreation road (potentially getting air over the crest, 50m before the intersection)
Then a panic, resulting in moving the body via boak road. Pause at the telstra tower and further planning there. Get caught on camera. Potentially wait for help.
Keep moving towards lal lal / Clarendon / Enfield. It's a ridiculous amount of area out there, with fire / motorbike tracks everywhere.
**edit: east along recreation rd
** I think I'm tending towards an initial accident out of self preservation. It's a more paletable feeling than 'Joe Nobody' waking up after a bender and deciding to attack someone. That horrifies me.
I agree. Also he may have seen this fifty year old woman jogging alone and thought she would be an easy target
In terms of where the accused might have put the body, anyone want to hazard a guess?
In my mind is the categorisation of killers: organised and disorganised and wonder what the accused might be and what this would mean for disposal of a body?
Good points, however I would have thought he'd be required to work on the Monday morning, and surely he wouldn't be carrying a body around in his vehicle. My feeling is perhaps the body was immediately hidden and then removed at some point in time, and relocated.i think instead of panicking he may have kept sms body in his vehicle a day or two, so he had time to think where was the best place, and ended up choosing a secluded lonely place with water, somewhere he may have discovered exploring years ago, knowing nobody would disturb him or find her,
the vehicle would still have a lot of evidence, no matter how much he washed it
Regardless of whether it was a panicked or calculated action after the fact, the accused still grew up in the area, was clearly the outdoor type, probably had a car licence for 4 years (I'm guessing), also rode motor bikes, enjoyed camping and spent his youth in and around the area. He would have a lot of knowledge of out of the way places for these activities, especially if he was partaking in illegal drug taking during them. What I'm getting at is that he knows the bush land and country areas, and there are a lot of them. He doesn't have to have been panicked, calm, or methodical, potentially just lucky. It could be blind luck that he chose a spot not on the police radar yet. Like looking for a needle in a haystack.I may be clutching at straws here, but with little info to go on, here are a few free floating associations …. Given the speed of the police notification and initial search for Samantha, the accused did not have long to collect and dispose of the body. Perhaps he exited the location first, and took his time to later dispose of the body? Of course the longer he took to do so, the greater the risk of being found with the body… The fact that the body has still not been found, in spite of rigorous searching for 5 weeks now, suggests to me a more methodical, calculated process rather than a panicked and disorganised effort? (Though I’m no expert). I may be completely wrong but as I think this through I sense a conspicuous absence of emotion, as well as some magical thinking, in this hypothetical scenario…. There is almost a quality of “now you see it, now you don’t…”. Aka., if the body “disappears” nothing actually happened… possibly an underlying lack of object constancy as seen in an infant/young child? I wonder if the accused’s silence reflects a similar sleight of mind? Aka., “if I don’t admit it, nothing happened?” All completely hypothetical, JMO…
Yeah, I saw that. However, in the scenario I laid out, LE won't have known about anything prior to being caught on trail cam / tower cam or whatever. Whatever they saw was enough to convince the DPP / OPP that they could substantiate a charge of murder. If their proof has PS showing at least a blatent disregard for human life, that's all they need. IMOVictoria Police Commissioner Shane Patton told media this afternoon that detectives questioned the man for more than 30 hours after he was taken into custody yesterday. He said police believed the murder was "a deliberate act" and "not a hit and run
I'm with you on this @Dotta - totally random attack. Wrong place at the wrong time. Completely opportunistic attack from someone who was on a comedown from a big night and wanted to feel powerful. But snapped out of his 'comedown' (whatever that looks like for him) pretty quickly as soon as the attack was over and thought 'crap, what have I done, I need to cover my tracks'.I think the attack was completely random.
Unfortunately,
the alleged perp and the lone runner crossed paths.
I guess the booze and drugs consumed by alleged attacker played the decisive role.
JMO
This is my theory too. Some of the mine shafts can be 100’s of metres deep, and they have water in them too I’ve read.I think the attack was completely random.
Unfortunately,
the alleged perp and the lone runner crossed paths.
I guess the booze and drugs consumed by alleged attacker played the decisive role.
JMO
Thanks for your insights. It's interesting to hear about the finer details of the area - especially the crest.My gut feeling is an initial accident around the boundary Rd / recreation road area, followed by a string of poor decisions. This intersection has a crest that obscures the intersection until its too late (loose gravel road, poor surface etc.)
You can get a fair amount of speed heading east along recreation road (potentially getting air over the crest, 50m before the intersection)
Then a panic, resulting in moving the body via boak road. Pause at the telstra tower and further planning there. Get caught on camera. Potentially wait for help.
Keep moving towards lal lal / Clarendon / Enfield. It's a ridiculous amount of area out there, with fire / motorbike tracks everywhere.
**edit: east along recreation rd
** I think I'm tending towards an initial accident out of self preservation. It's a more paletable feeling than 'Joe Nobody' waking up after a bender and deciding to attack someone. That horrifies me.
Is it still considered a "hit and run" if the person moves the body? I guess the nature of a hit and run is not deliberate.Victoria Police Commissioner Shane Patton told media this afternoon that detectives questioned the man for more than 30 hours after he was taken into custody yesterday. He said police believed the murder was "a deliberate act" and "not a hit and run
Imooapologies if this has already been said but does anyone think perhaps he isn't saying where the body is because he doesn't know where the body is? as in, if someone else helped him to dispose of the body then perhaps he really cannot say