To be honest, I really don't think the FB Rachel Trlica referred to above is the missing Rachel Trlica. I really don't see that someone who is "hiding something" related to murder or some other missing persons crime would be on FB under her real name. It's not that hard to use a "fake" name on FB; many people do. My own FB page is under a pet's name. I also don't find that particular Rachel Trlica's page to be odd as far "hiding something" privacy settings. I can see a review she's written, who she follows, 22 places that she's been, all of her "likes" and "dislikes," and 67 of her personal family photos. Doesn't really seem like someone who's hiding. On my page, non-friends can see exactly one thing: my fake name, period--no photos, no info, nada. And the only thing I'm hiding from is my students, so they won't have yet another place to hound me about when I'll finish grading their essays.
These days, you'd have to be nuts to have all your personal info on FB wide open (unless you're a business trying to get as many views as possible); this Rachel Trlica's FB security settings are pretty much standard for what a normally cautious person might list (and even more generous than I would suggest for anyone, and certainly for someone in hiding or hiding something).
I also found 75 "Julie Moseley"s on FB, with 3 of them being "Julie Ann" and 3 of them being in Texas (of those who had locations listed). And too many "Renee Wilson"s to count. I doubt any of these are the missing girls, either. It's true that both Moseley and Wilson are much more common names than Trlica. But...Trlica appears to be a Czech name, and there is a large Czech community in Texas (so much so that you can find mention of "Czech Texan" dialect). A name distribution search shows that, of Trlicas in the US, the vast majority are clustered in Texas. The 1940s is the most recent census available, and it shows 57 Trlicas in Texas. Multiply that by 6 decades of immigration and child-bearing later, and you've got yourself a lot of Texas Trlicas. Given the age of the Rachel Trlica in the FB photos, she appears to be of a generation when it was standard to take a husband's name upon marriage. So, while "Rachel" and "Trlica" aren't as common name-wise as "Julie," "Renee," "Moseley, and "Wilson," neither one is that unusual for Texas, so not that unusual for there to be more than one person named Rachel + Trlica in Texas, especially considering the number of Trlica families in Texas that one could marry into. And even if this person has been named Rachel Trlica from birth, I think the likelihood of two Rachel Trlicas from Texas is far more likely than that the missing Rachel Trlica is hiding due to her knowledge of a crime, yet has a publicly accessible FB account under her real name, with dozens of photos and other identifying information. Besides, Houston is a huge city. It's not that weird that, in the space of 40 years, there might be two Rachel Trlicas with some connection to Houston. And if you were running away, or forcing someone to write a fake note saying that they were running away, you'd pick the other really huge city in the state (besides D/FW). It would be a strange coincidence for two Rachel Trlicas to have some connection with Ozona, maybe. But not so much Houston.
It's 99.99% likely that this particular woman being referred to is not the missing Rachel Trlica. In which case, no one needs to be violating her privacy by trying to trace her ISP location or dragging her into a missing persons case.
If this is the missing Rachel Trlica...well, it's not a crime to go missing or stay out of contact, so we should leave her alone, and no one needs to be trying to violate her privacy by trying to trace her ISP. And if there was a crime committed against the other two girls (as seems likely for all three girls, actually)...well, while it is a crime to be an accessory after the fact (by concealing information)...she's on Facebook, under her real name, with photos, apparently living in the same state where the disappearance took place. She's not hiding from law enforcement...or if she is, she's really doing a poor job of it. (And I don't know what the statute of limitations for accessory after the fact, committed while a minor, might be).
Checking FB, MySpace, etc., is one of the standard first things to do when looking for anyone these days, whether it's a family looking for any clue to a long-lost loved one, or me looking to see if my high school boyfriend still has all his hair. So I'm pretty sure at some point someone in the Trlica, Moseley, and Wilson families has thought to check FB.
One might drop an e-mail to the MissingTrio page, or to the Doe site or some LE agency, about the FB page with the same name as a missing person (on the off-chance no family member or private detective has thought of it already). But I think we should stay away from talk of trying to trace ISPs, or listing the towns that some random stranger has been in according to her FB. It's just as important to respect the privacy of living, non-missing persons as it is to seek justice for long-missing and/or deceased ones.
