Elley Mae
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 21,954
- Reaction score
- 45,752
:waitasec:
Why would they claim to be representing him if he hadn't entered into some sort of agreement? I don't believe attorneys can speak on behalf of someone without their approval. JMO
They both appeared on an Orlando TV station and when asked said they only spoke to him by phone IIRC. (Please don't ask for a link)
Strange that they have been showing the most recent pictures of Trayvon, and he still looks like a normal kid. So I guess that's exactly what GZ saw that night, a normal kid, in jeans and a hoodie, just like we saw him wearing in pictures. Well if you don't count that gang bangin' Hershey's tshirt.
JMHO
C. We don't need you to do that, but you are within your rights to do so and it is not illegal.
C. We don't need you to do that, but you are within your rights to do so and it is not illegal.
And instead of George profiling Trayvon as a criminal, he could have rolled down his window and smiled nicely at Trayvon and said "hey young man, my name is George Zimmerman, I am the community neighborhood watch captain, it's raining outside would you like a ride to your door?"
GZ obviously thought TM was acting suspiciously. He did the right thing by calling LE. There were 8 recent break ins in the neighborhood so why wouldn't he be suspicious?
George Zimmerman had enough knowlege and training through his weapons permit and other sources to know precisely what was being said, and the fact that it was within his rights to follow Trayvon, and was not illegal does not relieve him of the responsibility of initiating and escalating a confrontation that led to the death of another.
It is not illegal for me to own an attack dog. If my ownership and stewardship of this dog, causes the death of a person I am legally responsible for my behavior and poor choices, so the issue is not the legality of his actions but the forseeable consequences of those actions.
With the information that George Zimmerman had the consequences of his actions that night were entirely foreseeable IMO JMHO and stuff.
Just the consequences are illegal. There is no term "Legal homocide, only justified". jmo
If only........
I want go O/T briefly and tell a story that I promise will tie directly back into this comment when I'm through. Some here at WS know that I am in the midst of a 2 year project of building a log house for my granddaughters on the side of a mountain in Tennessee.
About 6 months ago I took a crew of men up to frame in the roof structure that you see in this image. I was driving a dually truck pulling a trailer, loaded with lumber and other material, with Florida license plates.
About 2 miles from my driveway I looked in my rearview mirror to see blue lights flashing. I pulled over having no clue why I was being stopped. I was greeted by a Union County, Tennessee "good ole boy" Deputy who wanted to see my license and insurance. It didn't take long for me to realize why I was stopped.
Seems ole Papa's redneck azz was being profiled for out of state tags towing a load of lumber that, in the Deputy's view, needed checking out! It was a circumstance possibly even more suspicious than what Trayvon Martin was doing last February when he encountered Mr Zimmerman's ire.
In my situation, due to his sincerity and apparant zeal to protect the residents of the area, the situation rapidly diffused itself and this Deputy and I have become big pals. He goes by my place now on a regular basis just to check and make sure all is well when I'm not there.
It is a crying shame that something of the order of the comment to which I'm responding was beyond the grasp of George Zimmerman to consider. Trayvon Martin could be alive today.
Does Tracy Martin not live with his girlfriend? Does he have a separate residence?
After the following interview, Joe Oliver has nearly disappeared from the media. Video at the link:
Weapons training? How does that relate to being told "we don't need you to do that"? Following a person is not escalating a situation, but what TM may have done, attacking him, is. I don't think his actions created a situation that had any forsseable consequences...he got out of his car and was accosted by TM (yes, TM spoke to him first).
This sort of jumps backward, but I was afraid I'd forget. As to the "You got me" - if Trayvon said something, could it be "You shot me!" as in shock - "Oh my God you SHOT ME!!!"
If there was a struggle started by either (and sadly we may never know the whole truth) if Trayvon hit George at any point breaking his nose, they were apparently on pavement, George could have fallen and cut his head hitting the pavement as opposed to Trayvon slamming his head repeatedly into it. Actually, if his head was slammed repeatedly, I would expect more then a slice, even a big slice - at the very least there should have been a hematoma and lots of "mushy flesh" all around the cut.
And what I really, really need to know is when the gun came out? Or when George might have put his hand on it or reached for it. At that point Trayvon would have legitimately been in fear for his own life. Maybe he DID approached GZ simply to see what the deal was, but when he realized there was a gun and he's in too close quarters to flee, you panic (at least I think most of us would and certainly anyone but a hardened criminal) and maybe he thought GZ was going to pull the gun and fought.
Maybe the "wise" think to do would have been to back up, put your hands up and say let's wait for the police, but good grief, who would be logical when a gun comes out?