Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no proof that he did either. There is proof that GZ had injuries though.
There is no proof that he did either. There is proof that GZ had injuries though.
But there was a time when TM said he had lost sight of the man. GZ could have come from a hiding spot...just saying...we can go round and round...so, far the only one saying how it played out is the guy who is on trial for second degree murder. No other witness can say with any certainty how the two ended up behind the 2nd or 3rd townhouse, together and then on the ground.The GF information of TM and here he comes indicates GZ was in sight and moving. Apparently TM saw GZ easily enough. So, GZ wasn't hiding.
For the millionth time, Trayvon Martin did not cause all those scratches to GZ's face...there was NO GZ DNA under TM's fingernails. NONE.
GZ has a boo boo, but Trayvon is DEAD
That doesn't mean "feat." It means within inches.
GZ has a boo boo, but Trayvon is DEAD
For the millionth time, Trayvon Martin did not cause all those scratches to GZ's face...there was NO GZ DNA under TM's fingernails. NONE.
Maybe Martin had a hold of his gun hand twisting it or pushing it back?
GZ has a boo boo, but Trayvon is DEAD
"The reports also noted the fatal wound's surrounded by a two-by-two inch pattern called stippling, caused by gunpower burns. It suggests Zimmerman fired inches away from the teenager."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_1...ords-were-its-over/?google_editors_picks=true
Because as evidence it should have been photographed where it was found. I think we can all agree it was not found in that position otherwise the photo would have been of TM's body showing the can exactly where it was found and frankly we would not have seen it. What we would see is a picture after it was gather and bagged. IT DOES NOT BELONG THERE. It's evidence. <modsnip>
That still doesn't mean it was murder.
And this would, IMO, give more credibility to TM trying to get away from GZ because GZ was trying to keep TM from running away. There were no injuries to TM's right hand. He was right-handed. jmo
I disagree.
When someone tells someone that they don't *need* something, it doesn't mean that they don't *want* it or that it's unnecessary or that to proceed would be unwelcome.
My tired teenager was about to unload the dishwasher for me, and I said, "You don't need to do that."
Heck, it wasn't that it would be *unwelcome*. It was just that I felt that I could handle it better than he could.
He saw that I had a to-do list a mile long and said, "I can do it - it's not a problem."
GZ was present, in the neighborhood where a suspicious-looking stranger had just turned a corner.
Unless I am remembering incorrectly, GZ had not announced to the dispatcher that TM had turned a corner and disappeared from view. GZ just continued his description of what he was seeing as he commenced to move from his vehcile and walk towards the cut-through area.
GZ's eyes were on the situation, and he was in a better position to know what would be helpful to the policemen than a dispatcher who was just receiving remote information.
On a *typical* evening, GZ would have first seen TM while afoot, not from his vehicle. If that had been the case - that he was out walking his dog and continued to walk in the direction where TM had disappeared - would *that* have been a violation?
What is the deal with "tea"? That's exactly what it a was, a non alcoholic drink in a can made by the Arizona Iced Tea company. If you've looked at the TM 7-11 video, this bag is clearly the same one the clerk handed him and TM put the can in it in full view of the camera.
There's no need to create drama where no exists.
What is the gray object in the picture, just to the right of the midline? (not the sidewalk) Thanks