Ravenmoon
"Abby and Libby, forever loved."
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2018
- Messages
- 1,684
- Reaction score
- 17,918
But mandating the exclusion of other plausible theories that the Prosecution actually provided evidence of doesn't seem fair. The State is basically saying "we know you saw all that stuff we handed over that makes it obvious that there could be another person, or persons ("other actors" as Nick McLeland himself has said) responsible, but we didn't really think you'd notice that....please just keep that quiet because we want to convict THIS guy only, ok?"
It isn't like they are pulling these theories out of the air.....it's all stuff that's been uncovered by the investigators!
Remember, Doug Carter has told us that NOBODY has been cleared. I really hope the jury hears that.
JMO MOO
What they are saying, ( I hope that I understand correctly) is that the Defense isn't allowed to throw any old thing against the wall to see if they can confuse the important issues.
They have to provide information that is relevant and factual in order to bring in other players or issues.
How is that unfair?