VisitorDog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2022
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 1,445
Yes, I thought she went as far as she possibly could. Trying not to paraphrase but the inference was that AH knows more about her disappearance than he divulged, that MB is sadly deceased and that it should be investigated as a homicide. It doesn’t take much of a leap from there. IMO.The coroner can not attribute blame or accuse anyone or suggest anyone is liable - she can only go on what was presented at the inquest and her recommendations were in relation to that.
It isn't up to her to find him guilty of anything - she has opened the doors though to allow an investigation to happen and that he is part of that investigation. She did say he was unreliable and demonstrated a tendency to exploit vulnerable women and Marion.
Marions last documented evidence was of a withdrawal from her account in October - that was what was presented at the inquest - there was nothing else presented to suggest life after that time -
The coroner has to go with that - it doesnt mean she believes MB "herself" withdrew that last amount - it means that was the evidence presented to the court - her account was used - so figuratively speaking, that was Marion.