Snipped by me -
Have to agree with this TPS thought from post #1040 eyesonly - how did many searchers miss a fresh grave?
Guessing the property is the park a few steps from where EB's car was seen by RB and one witness on 19 June 1990 but gone later that night?
EB would have to be some deep in order not to surface or partially surface after 25 years. That would have taken a lot of time with a shovel - assuming 'whoever' had one at the time. What would work imo, is to place something heavy over a shallow grave - like patio stones.
The area we are looking at was never searched as per a witness who was there during that time and is still there today.
As for a freshly dug grave, youd be surprised at just how much ppl miss on searches. You can walk right past where a body has been buried, look to the left for a few seconds while walking and missed it on the right. It has happened. Even with bodied laying above ground. This is why most missing persons are found by accident, someone walking their dog or something like that.
Spinner revealed to us, without any prompting, that he was taught in the military how to camouflage a gravesite so you would never know it was there.
On one of the searches, one of the guys who worked for rb's PI, laid down behind a log or something and Mr B walked right over him talking to someone and the other person didn't see him either.
If EB is buried where we are looking and will eventually dig, to tell you the truth I will be absolutely shocked. But there is overwhelming evidence to at least make sure we clear it up.
We decided today we are going to go ahead and dig the area before end of Nov, the positives outweigh the negatives by.......well there really is no comparison.
Will let you all know the out come of the dig.