Ivy
Inactive
Toth, how are we expected to discuss "Flippy" if we don't know who he is? Is he the guy Colfax wrote about in the two links I posted above? A simple yes or no will do. If you refuse to answer, then what is the point of this thread?
Flippy Esso was a young man. I usually emphasize that he is not a sex offender, he was merely convicted of being a sex offender and the registration is that of a person convicted of the offense, it is not an admission of having committed the offense for which he was covicted. It never is. Registration merely acknowledged the conviction, not the offense.
I am not going to identify him any more specifically than Flippy Esso which is the name I've been using for him for some time. Many serious investigators/posters know his first name, a few seem to also know his last name. No one is posting that information. This is with good reason. If you know and live near Boulder you can get us good information and post it. If you don't know, don't ask. I won't reveal his name. He is "flippy esso"Originally posted by Ivy
Toth, how are we expected to discuss "Flippy" if we don't know who he is? Is he the guy Colfax wrote about in the two links I posted above? A simple yes or no will do. If you refuse to answer, then what is the point of this thread?
I do not know what Lou Smit has attempted to do or whether Lou Smit considers him to be a viable suspect. I do admit that the passage of time does indicate that such an obvious suspect may well have been cleared, but I do not know. I certainly think he is a better suspect than either of the parents ever were. I would hope that in a case like this the notoriety would force the forensic people to be diligent, but I certainly don't trust the BPD or CBI much.Originally posted by why_nutt
Lou Smit has not even attempted to build a compelling case against him.
the man must have been cleared, at the very least in Smit's opinion.
Originally posted by Ivy
Toth, how are we expected to discuss "Flippy" if we don't know who he is? Is he the guy Colfax wrote about in the two links I posted above? A simple yes or no will do. If you refuse to answer, then what is the point of this thread?
He was in the home on a prior occasion for an extended period of time, he is said by a co-worker to have had 'issues' with the 'wealthy class' and he is a known sex offender. It is not merely because he is a sex offender, but one who has a prior connection with the scene of the crime and a prior opportunity to know about the house and the occupants. The Ramseys were always generous to the people they employed but it is possible that if this was some 'sub-contractor' that the employee might have atleast felt he had been cheated.Originally posted by Sabrina
you cannot consider your Exon Flippy as a suspect just because he is a "registered sex offender."
It seems Elkins was some sort of roofer; Flippy Esso painted a basement. I don't think he was a roofer of any sort.Originally posted by Ivy
So Elkins is not Flippy, right?
Originally posted by TLynn
Did Flippy have a passion for pineapple?
The Ramseys did not know at the time of the electronic device and were only informed of all this later, after the murder and after a coworker of Flippy Esso came forward and said he was talking about The Wealthy Class alot.Originally posted by Britt
All I want to know is why the Ramseys covered for him.
Originally posted by Toth
The main thing is that one of his coworkers noticed that he had an electronic device underneath his pantleg and recognized it as an electronic monitoring device worn by parolees and the like.
Originally posted by Toth
The Ramseys did not know at the time of the electronic device and were only informed of all this later, after the murder and after a coworker of Flippy Esso came forward and said he was talking about The Wealthy Class alot.