Found Deceased France - Émile S., 2, outside grandparent’s house, Le Vernet, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, 8 July 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.

A statement released by public prosecutors in Aix-en-Provence on Sunday said 'genetic analysis identifies' the bones as belonging to Èmile.

It added that 'criminalistic analysis' was also underway, and that gendarmes were carrying out 'additional research' in the area where they were found.

The search site is two miles as the crow flies from the house in Haut-Vernet, a hamlet south of Grenoble, where Émile was last seen with his grandfather, Philippe Vedovini, 58.
Two miles as the crow flies— that is quite a way for the little guy.
 

From the link above, “a walker alerted police during a hike”.

Could simply be that Emile wandered off, though you’d think with the scale of the searches that took place, any areas the boy could have wandered would have been scoured previously.

Also, being that the village is quite isolated, would a hiker be more likely to be someone from the area? Or maybe a vacationer, in which case they may have been hiking more ‘off the beaten path’ so to speak, could explain why Emile wasn’t found earlier.
Tragic news.
From this article : Disparition d'Emile : ossements du petit garçon retrouvés, fouilles approfondies... suivez la situation en direct

"The area had been “extensively searched”
According to the mayor of Vernet, François Balique, the area where Emile's bones were found had "been thoroughly searched by the gendarmes", he told Le Figaro. “It’s a place where hunters and their dogs and residents pass daily and where forestry work was carried out in the fall,” he said, suggesting that if the body had been there from the beginning, it would inevitably have been discovered before."

I'm pretty sure his bones were moved not so long ago. It's not possible, after all the time and with all those resources that they had, that they didn't find him earlier.
No way he could have just ondered off and he was there since july. NO WAY.
 
I don't suppose any authorities would want to admit that the area where little Emile was found was not searched because they thought he couldn't have walked that far.
They did so much to find him, I can't believe they didn't check that particular place. I can't remember the exact perimeter around which they looked for him, but I think they went kinda far.
 
Could they have checked the area well, but he was hidden, under a bush/foliage/etc?
(Thinking of the recent case, Ashley T. An adult, the woods near her car were well-searched, but she was there the whole time. Likely hidden by snow during earlier searches.) JMO.
 
DIRECT. Disparition du petit Emile : des "recherches complémentaires" dans la zone après la découverte des ossements de l'enfant

Disappearance of little Emile: “additional research” in the area after the discovery of the child’s bones

Dogs and drones will be deployed in particular, the gendarmerie told franceinfo, the day after the discovery of human remains bearing the DNA of the two and a half year old child, missing since July.

No link with the reconstruction carried out on Thursday.

The discovery did not take place during the simulation organized two days earlier, a source close to the matter told franceinfo. Thursday, 17 members of the child's family, as well as neighbors and witnesses, were gathered in Haut-Vernet to retrace the day of the disappearance.

Additional analyses.
The Criminal Research Institute of the National Gendarmerie will, for its part, continue its analyzes of the bones to try to clarify the circumstances of the child's death.
 
no new information but the fact that a walker found him would suggest he was in the open.
What a terrible shame after the tremendous search efforts they all put in..
 
From this article : Disparition d'Emile : ossements du petit garçon retrouvés, fouilles approfondies... suivez la situation en direct

"The area had been “extensively searched”
According to the mayor of Vernet, François Balique, the area where Emile's bones were found had "been thoroughly searched by the gendarmes", he told Le Figaro. “It’s a place where hunters and their dogs and residents pass daily and where forestry work was carried out in the fall,” he said, suggesting that if the body had been there from the beginning, it would inevitably have been discovered before."

I'm pretty sure his bones were moved not so long ago. It's not possible, after all the time and with all those resources that they had, that they didn't find him earlier.
No way he could have just ondered off and he was there since july. NO WAY.
animals could have moved him.. shame there are only partial remains..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
159
Guests online
4,031
Total visitors
4,190

Forum statistics

Threads
593,486
Messages
17,988,083
Members
229,150
Latest member
BJarv
Back
Top