Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First I'd try searching this thread for his name to see if he's already been discussed. You may also want to post it here to get feedback from other users.How do we report a possible match if we suspect that a missing guy is a match to one of the bodies?
Body 10 and Body 13 are NCMEC cases, so they got updated composite sketches from NCMEC. I'm surprised Body 28 (the possible youngest victim still unidentified hasn't gotten a new sketch) though, as he's also a NCMEC case, but then NCMEC doesn't do these kinds of hand drawn reconstructions for all of their unidentified Does.Dumb question but can anyone explain to me why bodies 10 and 13 both have composite sketches of what they might of looked like but they didn’t do the same for bodies 21, 26 and 28? I mean i get it they have like a clay figure composite but not a drawn composite like 10 and 13 do. Why not just do all of them to make it easier to see what they may have looked like while living?
I have no idea but maybe their skulls weren’t complete? Like they could be missing some pieces.Dumb question but can anyone explain to me why bodies 10 and 13 both have composite sketches of what they might of looked like but they didn’t do the same for bodies 21, 26 and 28? I mean i get it they have like a clay figure composite but not a drawn composite like 10 and 13 do. Why not just do all of them to make it easier to see what they may have looked like while living?
It could be him, but there is a huge time span between time he went missing and probable time of death (1972 and 1976-77)I think I found a possible match for Body 13.
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
955UMIL
I would like to know what you think, for my part I think the statistics fit well so whoever wants to send this can do so.
I assume you would be referring to the recent Netflix documentary. I think that person simply had their license stolen when he met Gacy. After Gacy's arrest, Baker was interviewed about that happening. Gacy had many interactions with young men, and some of the licenses turned out to be connected to victims (Michael Bonnin's for example), but others were for people who turned out to be alive.I am almost sure one of the 5 unidentified victims was named Michael B. Baker! I've just watched documentary about Gacy and there appeared a photo of driver license with this name and characteristics - 5'10", 150 pounds, blue eyes, DOB - 24 July 1958 (John Wayne Gacy: Devil in Disguise, season 1, episode 1, timecode 27:00). His physical characteristics fit Body 10 and Body 21. What do you think about it?
Thanks for information! I am glad to hear the person I was talking about was not murdered by Gacy.I assume you would be referring to the recent Netflix documentary. I think that person simply had their license stolen when he met Gacy. After Gacy's arrest, Baker was interviewed about that happening. Gacy had many interactions with young men, and some of the licenses turned out to be connected to victims (Michael Bonnin's for example), but others were for people who turned out to be alive.
It'll be more fruitful to contact the LE agency handling the cases, since they are the ones who have to initiate contact with the DDP -not the other way around.Does anybody know what is the best way to contact DNA Doe Project? I would like to write them asking for continuing working with 5 unidentified victims.
Do you mean Cook County PD?It'll be more fruitful to contact the LE agency handling the cases, since they are the ones who have to initiate contact with the DDP -not the other way around.