That is correct, it had to do with the dna cloning aspects. There was a difference in the legal language that seemed to differentiate based on conception. Like I said it was an older document but it may still use the same language.
As far as -
And that may be the perceptional difficulty we have in finding the abductors. I don't know if you recall the human experimentation being done by the nazi's during wartime? Many a big pharma company was involved. The rest of the world was kept in the dark. Afterwards we forgive and forget.. The end justifies the means.
In this case if there was anything to it, the perps may have a legal basis to initiate the plan. The past history of the donor would have to be well known. The end reult of the coupling tested and demonstrable. The raising of the sample would have to be controlled from start to finish. This one had a peculiar bio marker that may have been useful for some testing purposes.
Big and bizarre will get around most any investigation or any investigator and seldom fails. From what I gather, the latest theory has an accidental death scenario followed by hiding of the evidence. The parents are again being implicated. If that is so, then are not these the same type people described- ?
As far as -
I think if someone is willing to use an abducted child for shadowy human DNA experiments they would tend to be such a criminal sort that they wouldn't give a carp about what the bioethics regulations are and wouldn't make sure to abduct a test tube baby just to conform with some European bio ethics act.
And that may be the perceptional difficulty we have in finding the abductors. I don't know if you recall the human experimentation being done by the nazi's during wartime? Many a big pharma company was involved. The rest of the world was kept in the dark. Afterwards we forgive and forget.. The end justifies the means.
In this case if there was anything to it, the perps may have a legal basis to initiate the plan. The past history of the donor would have to be well known. The end reult of the coupling tested and demonstrable. The raising of the sample would have to be controlled from start to finish. This one had a peculiar bio marker that may have been useful for some testing purposes.
Big and bizarre will get around most any investigation or any investigator and seldom fails. From what I gather, the latest theory has an accidental death scenario followed by hiding of the evidence. The parents are again being implicated. If that is so, then are not these the same type people described- ?
I think if someone is willing to use an abducted child for shadowy human DNA experiments they would tend to be such a criminal sort