I watched the trials, but I'm behind on any outside information about the case. I think they cannot prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because, to me, the crime makes no sense.
1. If QT incapacitated JC at his house, why didn't he take the gas can down there on the first trip?
2. If QT drove her down there and went back for the gas can, why would anyone leave a murder victim completely alone in a car on the side of the road, planning to return to the scene? They know people ride through there while drinking and smoking. And why leave her for 30 minutes without checking her pulse? Shouldn't you want to make sure your victim is dead? She was not dead. I cant get over how she could have walked away in this scenerio. Meanwhile, he is just out, walking aorund to his sister's house.
3. If Jessica was in the passenger seat naked, knocked out for 30 minutes, and QT did return to put gas all over the car and her, why is her cell phone outside the driver's side of the car unburned? If the tree in front of the car is burned, why is the cell phone not burned?
4. If JC got out of the car and wandered down the road, why did no one see her until the second trucks arrived? Why was the passenger door closed? A woman on fire really took the time to close the passenger door? If she was on the driver's side, why was that door closed? Seems like she would have thrown it open and not worried about closing it.
5. If QT put her on the driver's side to stage an accident, why didn't he redress her? Why were her clothes burned outside the car?
6. Did they find out what QT's sister's car smelled like? Did anyone they interview say QT smelled like gas at any point? Did they find his jacket he had worn previously?
7. They say he had burns on him, but if his buttocks were burned, then did his clothes appear burned in the store footage of him buying the dot card? Wouldn't employees there smell all that if he was wearing charred clothes?
8. Where is the evidence that he did something to incapacitate her at his house? Where is the evidence of hitting, striking or choking?
9. Is it not suspicious that her "best friend's" phone is off all this time? who runs out of minutes and doesn't try to get more on a saturday night? Who doesn't try to reach friends using someone else's phone? Who acts like this when they had plans with friends that night? She claims the plans were a surprise, but how could it be a surprise that people wanted to get together AT ALL? And where was the testimony of people planning this surprise with JC because none called JC. JC was going home to clean her room, right?
10. If JC could not speak after several minutes of burning as the experts claim, then the car or she was set on fire after 8pm. QT could not have done it and be on camera at 804pm if it happened any later. If she was burned at 8pm, she was damaged for at least 6 minutes before the trucks were called and about 10 or 11 minutes before anyone noticed her. Unless someone burned her in another place after burning the car first.
11. The lady who gave the ride to the guy. She says the man had no coat. QT had a coat unless he left it in JC car. Why would he do that if he is cold, walking to his sister's? He knew the aunt's house was on fire. How would QT know that? Because he "might" have seen the trucks? Well, fire trucks come for a variety of reasons. How would he know it was a fire and not something else? QT wore red. Why does she not remember red? He didn't have her drop him off by either house. Who knows. Maybe this was the person who did it, and that person met Tellis at his sisters, but Tellis was NEVER down on Herron road. Is that possible?
I just want the answers to these questions. For right now, I just can't say he did it because not only do these things above not make sense, but I don't trust the cell phone data because that expert manipulated it to get what he wanted and because it doesn't tell exactly where QT was in the same detail as JC's tells where she supposedly was.
I think they were together, eating and whatever outside his house after taco bell. I believe he might have rode down to that area with her for a drug deal or something. Maybe QT knew who they were meeting. Things went bad, and he left her with whomever they met and maybe he brought the gas can back for them. I think she was burned in an area away from the car. Whoever burned her threw her phone back over there by the car after QT was already gone because her phone goes off at 804pm when he is riding by the store camera.
I don't believe heat made her phone shut down because I can't figure out how her phone got outside the driver's side of the car if he was the driver. And why would he throw her keys somewhere? Leave them to burn in the car. It doesn't make any sense to take her keys.
The only way it makes sense to take her keys is if someone snatched her out the driver's side of that car. Her phone went flying onto the ground. The person who snatched her out the car takes her keys, so she can't jump in the car and leave. They get control of her and take her to another area in the woods to rape or try to rape. Then they burn her alive. They must have brought her clothes back to the car. Isn't there a burn pile for the clothes near the car?
She was naked, including no shoes. Who has sex in a car or rapes in a car by getting the person completely naked? And how do you rape someone in the front passenger seat with it laid back and her on top of you unless you have a weapon trained on her? Especially in that little bitty car.
QT said in a police interview that he used his nephew's track phone sometimes, so I think it's totally possible he got a call or called someone to meet him and JC down at that location for drugs or pills and something went wrong. Because he knew those people who it went wrong with, he erased his phone, left JC that text message, and possibly got the gas to help cover up after the fact.
Maybe he could have got a message on that other phone from an Eric, Kendrick, derek, Cedric, or any manner of "ric" type names and told her that person wanted to meet for pills or something. And if she said "Tambers," she can say "Tellis." Or maybe "Tewis," But why call him by his last name? Wouldn't a logial nickname be "Quint?"
I don't. That's kind of what I'm thinking right now.
