Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I must agree , why has another hearing not been set up as of yet,, this judge must be holding out , This is a small town these two guys are known many people I am sure know who did this deed They should come forward instead of letting these crap of human pieces get away with her murder DNA is certainly on the 4x4 family needs to press that DA a lot . There is many people getting away with bad deeds due to our criminal system stand up to our DA’s n Judge’s n Police as all is NOT what it should be . Her rights are not being protected . The rights of her killers are at this pointI know that there was a "potential suspect" and also there was a hearing concerning DNA etc. A judge didn't show to the hearing and I have found nothing about the suspect, DNA or hearing since. The suspect even had a lawyer. This leads me to believe that one of two things (or both) is happening. They know who did it and are working toward enough of a case to go to trial ( my problem with this is that the egos of some of these prosecutors get in the way and they won't go to trial unless the case is a slam dunk for fear of blemishing their record). Or, the potential suspect is someone with enough political connections that Judges are no showing hearings and investigations are being influenced. JMO. I Googled Sharon Ransavage, the lawyer for this "potential suspect". I wonder if anyone has asked her about the case or the suspects name in recent times? It is odd that in all these years a name hasn't surfaced.
I think people know who killed herYeah I have been thinking about that but maybe in some sort of other way I do wonder if the killer or killer(s) slipped up one day and told somebody about the murder.
I keep going back to post #1. What happened to the request for DNA from the individual in question? Was there another trial? It just seems weird that the police wanted to hold the suspect in investigative custody and go to court to get a DNA sample ( why not do it the clandestine way off a coffee cup etc.?). One would think that, whomever this suspect is, the police thought they were on the right trail. I guess one could surmise that they eventually did a DNA test and it came back as not a match, but why no follow up to the original article ( is it possible the results etc. could have been suppressed by the judge at the suspects request once the DNA was found to not be a match?).
The thing is even if the suspects DNA law enforcement has to match the DNA to somebody in CODIS. A person has to be in CODIS if they have committed a crime before. If a person never committed a crime they probably won't be in CODIS. In this particular case the guy who killed Sharon maybe never committed a crime again therefore he is not in CODIS. This case won't be solved unless the suspect who killed Sharon is in CODIS currently. The only other way to solve it is to get somebody who knows who did the crime. Do I think there is a person out there who knows who killed Sharon? In my opinion the answer is yes.I must agree , why has another hearing not been set up as of yet,, this judge must be holding out , This is a small town these two guys are known many people I am sure know who did this deed They should come forward instead of letting these crap of human pieces get away with her murder the DNA is certainly on the 4x4 family needs to press that DA a lot . There is many people getting away with bad deeds due to our criminal system stand up to our DA’s n Judge’s n Police as all is NOT what it should be . Her rights are not being protected . The rights of her killers are at this point