I agree with you that incest is in the Top Five (remember Family Feud?) most likely scenarios. And your personal experience (so sad
) must really underscore how convincing it is.
Logicalgirl said it already, that the generalized hinkiness that's OBVIOUS in the Anthony family is attributable to other scenarios, and you know what, the scenario that we individually "prefer" naturally harks back to our own personal experiences.
My personal experiences were not incest, at least the physical kind of incest. My father has a personality disorder and a few mood disorders as well, he was and is a mistake of human evolution.
I see, in the Anthony family, the "origins" of the hinkiness in psychopathology, a deeply narcissistic mother (CA), her darling sociopathic daughter KC, and the practically invisible Lee and castrated George.
Incest is not always "physical", it is also emotional and psychological and may no have sexual overtones at all. Incest is gross violation of interpersonal boundaries. Whether we are aware of them or not, the sanctity of a persons boundaries is implicit in all one's behaviors, attitudes, responses. To everything
So I see in the Anthony family shades of the violations that occurred in my own family.
This is why Baez is SUCH a turd. He knew how the "incest" thing would grab folks by the shorthairs. Whether we suffered from it ourselves or not, 99% of people have a visceral rage when the very idea of it comes up. We stop thinking and start reacting with disgust and desire to rescue.
I have not been convinced of the incest issue at all, in this family. But that's beside the point, because I did not directly witness incest or not-incest, you know?
I do not believe that even if KC was molested by her father that it RESULTED in her behavior after Caylee "drowned", there is no logical progression there, just shorthair pulling. Just knee-jerk rage reaction. It does not make SENSE. It does not "follow". Especially, it must "follow" in a court of law. What you and I decide or think about in the privacy of our own lives is fine, but in a court of law there MUST be logical inference.
To me, this is the primary failure of this jury. That they were easily led by shocking emotionalism, and then (by their own words) they had to backtrack and make excuses for their decision and thus, whether the Pinellas 12 really do lack native intelligence, it sure SOUNDED like it.