Okay, I'm new here... And I've *tried* to read all the threads but haven't plowed through it completely yet. I had a couple of observations that could be way off or just coincidental:
- if you search the offender registry for Oklahoma and find a picture of Christopher Placker, you could make yourself see a resemblance to the guy in the sketch, if he had longer hair, etc. Am I the only one who sees this?
- Vicky and Peter both have criminal records, too. It sure seems to me like they are innocent, though.
- my husband (who does not get into this stuff at all) didn't even know about this case.
.. So I was filling him in and he couldn't believe that the grandparents didn't hear gunshots. I agree with that since I grew up in a rural area where hunting is popular and you can hear a gunshot a long ways off even in a wooded area. I mentioned the possible use a silencer, and he said that ballistics would show if a silencer was used or not.
Just trying to cover bases and not point the finger at innocent people, but - did Peter actually talk to Skyla's mother, or did Vicky? Just thinking of the timeline. IF you wanted to follow someone on a dirt road and hurt them and have an excuse for your footprints being there, that would be a good story - that you had to go find them for such-and-such reason. Also, if the family has so many run-ins with the law and alot of connections to gangs (Banditos?) or serious criminals, then perhaps Peter and Vicky do know more but are keeping their mouths shut out of fear.
Again, I apologize if this has been said before or if I am waaaaay off. My gut tells me that P/V are not involved in the actual killing, but my head tells me that at a minimum they might know something. Just had to unload my thoughts here...
... and get some feedback. Thanks.
