State v Bradley Cooper 04/04/11
- Thread starter Cheyenne130
- Start date
New Posts
-
WA WA - Nadia Erika Cole, 22, missing from SeaTac, 29 May 2024
- Latest: AnyNameIWish
- Status
This is just a really touchy case. Welcome to the board!
:rollercoaster:
We tend to agitate each other (even getting put in Time Out (and occasionally banned) because it's a diverse group with a lot of opinions and different life experiences.
I think domestic violence riles them up more than usual. But, just stick your finger in the cage and take your chances.
(Ironically, if there were no differences of opinion, these threads would be like three posts each, instead of four and five hundred) and you could zip through two years of coverage in 2.5 seconds.
Cheyenne130
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,823
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes. The "hair" in the trunk wasn't hair.
Who wants the run-down on court today? Other than having to share an elevator with the obnoxious Mr. Duncan and two ADAs at the same time (It seems CD is always "ON" which puts me "OFF")
BTW, PF Chang's anyone?
FYI: Jurors paid more attention to BC than KL (probably because of how hard it was to listen to the testimony) and I think the bug guy had a bigger splash for the defense than the prosec.
HP and CC were there (I think) today for support for KL.
KL was awesome on the stand, but again...nothing.
The cop, poor cop, was very hard to watch. You'd thought someone had taken his puppy.
BTW, PF Chang's anyone?
FYI: Jurors paid more attention to BC than KL (probably because of how hard it was to listen to the testimony) and I think the bug guy had a bigger splash for the defense than the prosec.
HP and CC were there (I think) today for support for KL.
KL was awesome on the stand, but again...nothing.
The cop, poor cop, was very hard to watch. You'd thought someone had taken his puppy.
Cheyenne130
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,823
- Reaction score
- 0
You were there again?? (You lucky dog!) I want to hear!!
What's your read on the jurors? Also, how did Brad act when Krista was on the stand? General mood of the courtroom.....
Goodness..I sense some baiting going on..Iggy is my friend..
Im off to eat and hit the hay..Catch ya all in the morning..
Salut:seeya:
Well suppose it's like the old saying....when the going gets tough.............
Me too!
lib's mom
New Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2010
- Messages
- 752
- Reaction score
- 1
I want the rundown! I want the rundown! I want it ALL, from the elevator on through!
I also have a question. Does Brad ever acknowledge anyone in in the courtroom, beside his legal team, his legal pad and his giant ego?
Don't tease about PF Chang's. We don't have such things in my tiny NC county. Now get to typing!
Cheyenne130
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,823
- Reaction score
- 0
I can only speak for myself. I like to be challenged and even "called out" if I'm not applying all the rules of logic. I'm not on the jury and I don't have a personal stake in this case. I do have an extreme interest but want the true outcome. I wouldn't want an innocent man in jail and I certainly don't want a guilty man to walk. Stick around and put on your 'thick skin'.
gracielee
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,095
- Reaction score
- 8
EXACTLY! If my husband made me try on clothes, and then tell the salesperson 'my husband will return later to critique my purchases and then decide if I'm able to have this new bathing suit or not', I'd be both humiliated and furious. Treating his wife like a bratty teenager. no respect what so ever. How was he even able to simply take her name off a joint checking account?
Palomine
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2011
- Messages
- 1,291
- Reaction score
- 3
thanks, I was watching the Gribble Trial when this one started
and you see nothing wrong with the erased blackberry...and the supposed straw that was never collected, or even mentioned for over a year and a half ?
less0305
The face is familiar, but I can't quite remember m
No, I think that Websleuths discourages the attack of someone who has not been named a suspect, is a witness or victim in the case. If there were evidence that JA committed some crime or was a person of interest, the police would have investigated her or named her as such. I don't think persons who have not been shown to have done anything criminal are to be a target. But I will stand corrected if I am wrong about what I understand Websleuths to allow or not allow.
Ya think the jurors were looking from some reaction from him when KL was on the stand? It's like Nancy was there. Bless her.
FullDisclosure
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 561
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't remember anything about hair on the front tire, but testimony showed that:
1. The vegetation in the wheel well was grass.
2. The "hair" in the trunk was a fiber. A trunk fiber.
Palomine
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2011
- Messages
- 1,291
- Reaction score
- 3
I can only speak for myself. I like to be challenged and even "called out" if I'm not applying all the rules of logic. I'm not on the jury and I don't have a personal stake in this case. I do have an extreme interest but want the true outcome. I wouldn't want an innocent man in jail and I certainly don't want a guilty man to walk. Stick around and put on your 'thick skin'.
Just the fact that two of her friends phoned the Police to report Nancy missing ...speaks volumes ..Brad did not call the Police ever!
Court today: (Having to attend 800 pieces of a custody case finally has an end in site and most of what I did today was sit in on the third floor)
Brad Cooper did make eye contact (at or with or in the general direction of KL) and I hear that WRAL reported otherwise. I think it was unwelcome eye contact. The jury soaked her up. She looked and sounded compelling. Definitely NOT a smoking gun, but an appropriate puzzle piece (Sorry, got to give something to both sides) The direct continues tomorrow. I don't think cross will be either long or disrespectful because honestly it doesn't need to be. (Legally speaking, she simply seemed like the sister of the victim and did not add many new opinions) It did get me to thinking one thing: Why didn't he deny the murder or proclaim innocence, etc? It seems like he would have "needed" her family too (thinking of the girls)
The cop and the straw made a tough sell for the prosec. (Mainly eyebrows jumped around because of the whole 20 month thing, the not telling detectives IMMEDIATELY after having recognized that the straw could be similar. There was a lot of chit chat while he was talking at the tables and I think pretty much everyone checked out with him.) They should have left him out all together.
The bug guy didn't "lose credibility" but it got read as flat out admitting that the science allowed for a much larger window. This was definitely when everyone in the courtroom was scribbling furiously (jurors, audience, etc) He was a mediocre witness, and honestly, it didn't really help that the "mica" testimony got blown open the same way. HOWEVER, I get the impression that these are the things folks are looking for because they are more "direct-circumstantial" evidence. I know that sounds odd, but the truth is they do reasonably tie him to the scene and a time-line and I don't think you can "un-ring that bell" with cross.
Not much going on. They ended early. I have another two days next week. Hoping to get some "defense time" in later as well.
The court room has an eerie somber tone when pictures pop up, but it generally is just a court room atmosphere, quiet and mostly respectful of the process.
FYI: Mr. L sat through ALL of it. I have a little girl and my heart broke for him.
Brad Cooper did make eye contact (at or with or in the general direction of KL) and I hear that WRAL reported otherwise. I think it was unwelcome eye contact. The jury soaked her up. She looked and sounded compelling. Definitely NOT a smoking gun, but an appropriate puzzle piece (Sorry, got to give something to both sides) The direct continues tomorrow. I don't think cross will be either long or disrespectful because honestly it doesn't need to be. (Legally speaking, she simply seemed like the sister of the victim and did not add many new opinions) It did get me to thinking one thing: Why didn't he deny the murder or proclaim innocence, etc? It seems like he would have "needed" her family too (thinking of the girls)
The cop and the straw made a tough sell for the prosec. (Mainly eyebrows jumped around because of the whole 20 month thing, the not telling detectives IMMEDIATELY after having recognized that the straw could be similar. There was a lot of chit chat while he was talking at the tables and I think pretty much everyone checked out with him.) They should have left him out all together.
The bug guy didn't "lose credibility" but it got read as flat out admitting that the science allowed for a much larger window. This was definitely when everyone in the courtroom was scribbling furiously (jurors, audience, etc) He was a mediocre witness, and honestly, it didn't really help that the "mica" testimony got blown open the same way. HOWEVER, I get the impression that these are the things folks are looking for because they are more "direct-circumstantial" evidence. I know that sounds odd, but the truth is they do reasonably tie him to the scene and a time-line and I don't think you can "un-ring that bell" with cross.
Not much going on. They ended early. I have another two days next week. Hoping to get some "defense time" in later as well.
The court room has an eerie somber tone when pictures pop up, but it generally is just a court room atmosphere, quiet and mostly respectful of the process.
FYI: Mr. L sat through ALL of it. I have a little girl and my heart broke for him.
I was in the elevator with CD from the lobby up to the ADA floor (I can't remember the number, but it's higher up and did not realize the young male ada (Is his name really BOZ?) and the young lady were standing beside me. Those elevators are PACKED early each day. CD has a much more pronounced accent when standing 2 feet away in an elevator and was cracking wise the whole agonizing trip. (Stops at every floor from the deck to the ADA floor, where he got off, which was weird because it was several floors above the trial court room).
- Status