Exactly!:clap:indallas2 said:I have to AGREE 100% with everything you just said. If they were both really IN LOVE then they would of married BEFORE having this child and why so fast???
Exactly!:clap:indallas2 said:I have to AGREE 100% with everything you just said. If they were both really IN LOVE then they would of married BEFORE having this child and why so fast???
shopper said:This is the fakest relationship I've ever heard of. There is NO WAY anyone will ever convince me that this is a relationship based on love, a real friendship or anything of the kind. IMO, Katie was "handpicked" for an arranged relationship and for childbearing. She is having this child IMO, FOR Tom, exactly like Michael Jackson and Debbie Rowe's arrangement.
"Tucked away" my azz, she's being held hostage by Tom and the cult.
eve said:If that's true, why would she do it? Money? It's not like she was destitute, for cryin out loud. I agree there's something weird about them, but just what it is, I do not know. Why would she toss aside her own family values/beliefs for a "fake" brood mare relationship?
Eve
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/03/razzies/Tom Cruise stands head and shoulders above other individual contenders with an impressive three Razzie nominations, as worst actor for War of the Worlds and a double spot in a newly created Razzie category of most tiresome tabloid targets. Cruise earns a nod both for his anti-psychiatry rants and his relationship with actress Katie Holmes, herself somewhat unfairly nominated for worst actress for her turn in Batman Begins. Holmes finds herself pitted against Jessica Alba (Fantastic Four) and Jennifer Lopez (Monster-in-Law) in this category.
j2mirish said:Quote
Tom Cruise stands head and shoulders above other individual contenders with an impressive three Razzie nominations, as worst actor for War of the Worlds and a double spot in a newly created Razzie category of most tiresome tabloid targets.
I dont believe Tom Cruise stands head and shoulders above anyone!!!
j2mirish said:I dont believe Tom Cruise stands head and shoulders above anyone!!!
eve said:So apparently Cruise has said "I'm not giving her a chance to turn into another Nicole," or something to that effect.
Mr. Cruise, Katie Holmes is no Nicole Kidman. BTW, did everyone see Nicole last night w/ Keith at the Grammy awards? She's hot, he's hot and TomKat's NOT! I love it!
Eve
michelle said:katie looks terrible these days in every pic i see her in..There is some crazy stuff going on between them....
shopper said:Well hell, it's probably finally starting to sink in, what she's gotten herself and her unborn Scientology sacrifice into.
Yes, I heard that as well (actually, I think I read it). Who knows with these two--maybe the recent pictures of her in that ridiculous body suit thingy have been doctored. You know--her head on top of someone else's body. Nah...the pictures probaby do tell the awful truth, although I wish they were doctored!KrazyKollector said:If this has already been mentioned, I apologize.
Has anyone heard the buzz that TomKat's baby is due right about the opening of MI-3? I thought I either read or heard the baby is due on the day of MI-3's premier. :sick: :croc: But, maybe I am hearing things....
shopper said:Yeah, I saw her on t.v. and Nicole's botoxed-to-hell-and-back face isn't what I'd consider hot. She was very beautiful at one time but she looks like a freak now IMO. Very sad. I like her and all and she's a classy chick but she has that plastic look going and it isn't anything I'd ever want for myself.
:twocents: