Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Phew! Is he cross or is he cross?It's abut the Ratliff filing - the guy who tried to delay the trial at the last minute.
Boyce: "I was angry then and I'm angrier now."
So, judge is demanding that Ratclif argues his case and not the attorney he’s bought along. They are now conferring.WHAT is happening?
I would think that alone could get him in BIG trouble!He also mistakenly signed as "attorney for the defendant". This is a joke.
It was an honest mistake. He only did it three times. And the typos were due to his nervousness.I would think that alone could get him in BIG trouble!
I think it’s more a case of drunk filing and I think the judge thinks that too. He’s steaming mad! Anyway, done and dusted and he’s been sanctioned. I cannot believe how an attorney dares to argue with a judge. So disrespectful.He also mistakenly signed as "attorney for the defendant" and got the case number wrong. This is an obvious joke. Someone is messing with the judge.
I have no idea!What would the benefit of this filing be?
If it was a drunk filing, can't they withdraw it later?I think it’s more a case of drunk filing and I think the judge thinks that too. He’s steaming mad! Anyway, done and dusted and he’s been sanctioned. I cannot believe how an attorney dares to argue with a judge. So disrespectful.
I’ve heard “Have we met before?”.Have not heard that pickup line but I have heard "I think we met in the pre-existence."
I’m not watching. Is he angry because Prior had called him?And boy does he sound it! Very controlled anger mind you, but yeah, he doesn't sound happy.