Well I noticed on NG BD says she looked in on HD Monday but it was dark.
And in her new timeline she says she looked in on HD and her TV was on.
Anyone else confused by this two statements?
Was it dark or was the TV on?
I agree. And this is my problem with BD's "press conference" statement and timeline.
I have great compassion for BD and acknowledge that she is a victim and that it is her daughter who is missing.
I am also a professional writer (copywriter, business writer, not a novelist) and for me words --and facts-- are my life.
When someone keeps changing their statements, even by changing a few words, it CHANGES THE MEANING and CHANGES THE FACT of the statement. On NG, she said she looked in and the room was dark -- no mention of the TV being on. In this new statement, she leaves Hailey asleep with the TV on. As far as I am concerned, it is different -- she is in essence changing the facts about what she stated before.
Same as SA and his job. First he goes in to work then quits, then he is fired and goes into work to clear out the locker. The FACTS HAVE CHANGED.
This is what is making me (and many sleuthers) crazy about this case.
I am not sure what is going on here, but from my life experiences, I suspect that this has been orchestrated by someone other than BD. This is my opinion. God Bless Hailey, and God Bless BD. I pray that BD will not someday regret making these statements and remaining friends with SA during this trying time.