j2mirish said:her name is Laney--- I believe her husband was in the house at the time- the baby is blind now from his injuries, if i remember correctly- I saw an areest picture of her, there was blood all over her------ I just dont understand.........................................................
at the very least she admiited she did it.........
I didn't get to watch anymore of the trial, grrr. Her husband was home? How'd she manage to do all of that with him home? From the parts I did hear, it sounds very pre-meditated. She was waiting for the final sign from God to go ahead and do it. And beating them with stones! Are we to look the other simply because she was insane at the time? I saw that 5 different shrinks agree she was. Now what?j2mirish said:her name is Laney--- I believe her husband was in the house at the time- the baby is blind now from his injuries, if i remember correctly- I saw an areest picture of her, there was blood all over her------ I just dont understand.........................................................
at the very least she admiited she did it.........
beesy said:
Goody said:
this cami, is just what i dont understand---------------------when i read of the newborns found in dumpsters..etc--- it just ripps my heart out- they are too frigging stupid to just take these babies to a hospital, or in most states, a fire-dept- no questions asked.................cami said:
They don't want angry adult children popping up later up asking why. Nor do they want others to think ill of them because they just quit parenting. They probably aren't thinking straight to begin with but I think the above is a large part of it.cami said:
so it is just easier to kill, or leave them to die, than to explain? I myself can say without a doubt, I would feel much better about someone that gave a child up, than someone who is in prison, because they didnt.....left the baby to die instead...and that is always the case for people who committ these horrendousGoody said:
Goody said:
There are reasons for everything. Even Hitler had reasons to do what he did. But reasons are not the same as excuses, even if they try to use them as excuses. All reasons do is explain why something happened the way it did. So don't get upset. If a young mother kills her newborn because she doesn't want a child growing up out there somewhere without her, it means nothing when it comes to prosecution and punishment. It just helps explain where their head was at when they committed the crime, and that might aid the jury in decided how harsh the punishment should be or which charges are more appropriate in the conviction. In this case, would probably show her to be extremely selfish, which definitely would not help her in the sentencing phase. See? Knowing the whys is not all bad. :woohoo:j2mirish said:
Very true, CP.concernedperson said:
