Why would she go back to pick up a broken bike that didn't belong to her, as I read it was her brother's bike?
However, since someone has said the bike was in the bushes at or near the park and ride, which I'm assuming is a parking lot, there is one house on the end of the park and ride, then 1st Street. I also read on this thread that the bike was still in the bushes, so she never actually got the bike, but that's the reason she would have been there, but something happened before or as she approached the bike?
This is contrary to what I have read in that a family friend sent the brother home because they were fighting, and that same person saw her last on 5th and Maple, as he/she was going to work?
So, he/she lives in that area, and would likely not be at or near the park and ride 15 to 30 minutes earlier, at least I wouldn't think so.
Did I imagine that he took the bike with him, or assume that since it was his bike?
She didn't have it with her as she left her friend's house, so he must have taken it with him, correct?
But if the family friend saw them at the park and ride instead, or on Mommasen instead of Maple, wouldn't that be close to home? So, why would she dump the bike in the bushes instead of him taking the bike home when they were so close to home when he was sent home?
So, this info of the bike being in the bushes doesn't make sense.
And her going to pick it up if it was there doesn't make sense either.
I also read on this thread that her brother has been seen riding said bike around town. So, I guess it isn't broken anymore. And why would they be pushing a broken bike around town to begin with? It's a small town, drop it, and pick it up on your way home, why hide it, no one is going to steal it, and they expected to be heading back in that direction within minutes since they were going to see if her friend could spend the night. The whole bike thing doesn't make sense to me.
The park and ride is on the same street she lives on, and if her shirt, and shoe were found almost within eyeshot of her home, if I were 10 or 11, the only reason I wouldn't be screaming as I was running, if someone was chasing me, and/or grabbing me, is if home was not a refuge, therefore, her brother, mother, or anyone else living in the home, would be suspect to me especially if her mother didn't work evenings and she had every reason to believe her mom was home. Imo, she was too close to home to decide to hide instead of run if her shirt and shoe was found in that area. moo
If her shirt and shoe was found in that area, it doesn't make sense to me that LE would say she was last seen on Maple, or that that area wouldn't have been taped so no one would be able to contaminate the crime scene.
LE has said her mom and brother are not suspects, therefore, I don't think the info about her shirt being found in that area is accurate. moo
I also read that her scent was found at the water tower.
Does anyone know if that was a spot her and her friends hung out at or if she was known to have been there within the prior three days of her disappeance? tia