CuriousCat3131
Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2017
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 38
When is the next press conference? Next Friday? Or is there one scheduled for Tuesday?
A black SUV was seen circling the Iowa neighborhood where Mollie Tibbetts was staying on the night she vanished, a neighbor revealed to Fox News on Sunday, in what could be a new clue to the college student's disappearance.
The driver went very slowly around the neighborhood the night of July 18, according to a young woman who lives a block away from the home of Tibbetts' boyfriend, Dalton Jack
Suspicious black SUV circled neighborhood on night Mollie Tibbetts vanished, neighbor says
I just wish the lady had got a license plate.
Directed at no one in particular:
“WS maintains zero tolerance for members who create posts intended to antagonize other members.”
Rules - Etiquette & Information
If you see a post that violates the TOS, please report it.
When is the next press conference? Next Friday? Or is there one scheduled for Tuesday?
Small town kids often have “street smarts” as well. And Mollie had a year of UI in Iowa City under her belt as well.She was born in San Francisco, lived in Oakland until 6 (sounds like father could be in the Navy??). Father lives in Fresno now.
So she really doesn't have Oakland 'street smarts'.
The passport is mailed to you. I think you can even take your own pics if you follow the passport pic rules. Size, smile?
Were there funeral home activities that day involving out-of-town people?That's certainly the most direct and simple interpretation of what we know.
My starting point with Mollie was to look at points where she was seen running. That information is incomplete, with the last point I'm aware of being the Funeral home. If it was her intention to head North towards her mom's house from that point, one reason why there are no more sightings of Mollie is because she might have been abducted between the funeral home and her mom's house.
Thank you! I thought it was Tuesday, but was not sure.Tuesday. I havent heard what time.
I noticed you were back after a while, good to see ya SteveP. I actually mentioned Foxfire in a post here, wondering what he would have to say here and had some thoughts. I’ll see if I can dig it up.I have been a member here for a little over 6 years, and lurked for quite a while before that. I have followed quite a lot of cases here, though I periodically slip away until something else brings me back. This case brought me back this time, as well as some updates on a cold case from 1972 in my city. Just wanted to say, in cases like this one, I think of an old friend here, who I never met, but always valued his insight, and know that he would be here if he could be. I am sure many of you know who I am talking about....Foxfire. I believe he is up there in Heaven now, watching, and if, God forbid, the worst has happened to Mollie, I am sure he was right there to welcome her with open arms. Rest easy, my friend. We will carry on for you...
Not sure who you are referring to. I see no one who is INCREDULOUS.Since people seem incredulous that the FBI would talk to a witness more than once, here's a data point: I, personally, have sat through multiple 12-hour FBI interviews with a witness who was not only formally cleared, but given immunity for the testimony.
I don't believe her. If she saw this, I would think she would have mentioned it sooner - like maybe 2 or so weeks ago. And if she just thought about it, how does she know she had the right date? I could be wrong, but you've got to wonder if she wants to insert herself into the investigation for attention, or if she wants the reward (which if it's false, she wouldn't get anyway). JMO
Well, I tend to believe that she was a little obsessive about social media, judging from her mom saying that she was sending Snapchats like mad to her bf, who wasn't into social media all that much--because she wanted him at the top of her friends list.
Here’s an optimistic view here. LE being tight lipped means that they have made a lot of progress and don’t think that sharing anything, is going to aid in Mollie’s recovery. You don’t have this type of effort, with all these resources, unless you are confident of a crime. So I discount what they say, and focus on what they are doing. I do think they know when she went missing, and where she went missing from.I think maybe LE could be using her ending of digital trail as time of disappearance...they would see her pattern and when it stopped, something happened. I hope it is more than that, but that is my feeling. I don’t hear the confidence many of you when LE has spoken, in general. They seemed to still not be sure if they had a crime, last time they spoke. Jmojmojmo
Thank you for the insight! Curious if you watched the interview, and what your opinion of WC is?
Yes! Absolutely DO NOT get in a vehicle simply because the perp is armed. Run! Run and scream!!! Statistically, the chances of you succumbing to a fatal wound by gunfire as a moving target in this scenario are very very low. In fact, the perp will most likely not shoot but rather just move on to a victim who does not know this. You should NEVER get in a vehicle under these conditions. If you do, you are only going to the secondary crime scene which is never good! This scenario is not like an armed mugging where you hand over the goods and they take off. You don’t “do exactly what they say” and make it out. Studies have shown this to be true time and time again. So let’s at least educate people on this. Every single person out there needs to know this:You and me both!! After reading the cautionary warnings of the experts of what may happen to you if you are taken, I'd rather it be right there on the spot.
About her eyesight, she is near sighted. One of her family members said she needed them for driving, and I think it was her aunt who said she can't see anything without them.Since I had these all set for multi-quote, I've decided to just respond this time instead of deleting all of them because it took me too long to get to the end of the new posts.
Looking at a picture of her wearing her glasses, she looks very far-sighted (just like her father). She could probably run without them, but it might be a bit uncomfortable.
Since sex trafficking hasn't been mentioned lately, I'll throw in - maybe he had a quota to meet, and just MT wasn't enough after some near misses.
The dogs don't sleep downstairs, they were said to most likely sleep with her.
Now he would have been hard to forget if he was the same guy! Can you imagine the nightmares a kid would have after being chased by a masked 300 pound guy with suspenders and a straw hat?
The article says she reported it to the FBI when questioned. Do you know when that was?I don't believe her. If she saw this, I would think she would have mentioned it sooner - like maybe 2 or so weeks ago. And if she just thought about it, how does she know she had the right date? I could be wrong, but you've got to wonder if she wants to insert herself into the investigation for attention, or if she wants the reward (which if it's false, she wouldn't get anyway). JMO