ProfCluezo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 3,469
I wonder what kind of access PS has to “the news” in remand….? ![Wink ;) ;)]()
RSBM. The DM catches flak for its medical and science reporting — no surprise for a tabloid. But in other news, they hold their own against other media outlets. And let’s face it, they do have the best pictures. How do they pull that off...The DM has great pictures early on, and often has detail other sources don't, but their hit and miss record for truth means there's always the need for a pinch of salt when relying on them as a source.
Yes agree!!!I'm curious as to what caused them to want to search there in the first place.
From my understanding it's unlikely they would get any data from the phone having been in water for so long and potentially damaged before it even went in the water. As for fingerprints and DNA the research paper I read yesterday found that fingerprints at least were unlikely to be found after so long but there's still a chance as there is no current in a dam. EDITED to add the amount of retrievable data greatly depends on the model of phoneAnyone know what kind of info might be potentially retrievable from the phone in that condition? Those flip cases are remarkably protective in my experience…
TBH I find it a little unprofessional that they were congratulating each other at all but I get it they're only human and have been working their butts off for this case.IMO - It would seem strangely inappropriate for police to be congratulating each other over finding a completely unrelated mobile phone whilst searching for Samantha Murphy.
They could just use a bananas for scale like the rest of us lolI think it is a metal “set square” that police use to measure anything found .. length by width … often such items are placed next to evidence when photographed to enable future viewers to identify the size of items found at a later date …
IMO
$$$$$RSBM. The DM catches flak for its medical and science reporting — no surprise for a tabloid. But in other news, they hold their own against other media outlets. And let’s face it, they do have the best pictures. How do they pull that off...
Try to keep in mind also the fact this was a search closed off to the public. There just happened to be a news chopper in the air snooping on them. Not much they could do about it. Good on them. I'm sure they felt a huge emotional relief after all these months. They know she is dead. They want to give the family closure and bring the murderer to justice.Police are human beings and have feelings like everyone else.
I don't see it as unprofessional to show emotion.
It does show how much concern they have for Samantha and her family and for getting some answers for them.
Channel 7 has a history of wrongly identifying people alleged to have committed crimes, and then being taken to court for it.The Daily Mail credible? Is this sarcasm?
Edit. Oh didn't see your wink face.
7 is credible enough they wouldn't state this in print otherwise.
Channel 7 has a history of wrongly identifying people alleged to have committed crimes, and then being taken to court for it.
I prefer to wait until news outlets other than Channel 7 and the Daily Fail state something.
I know that.Try to keep in mind also the fact this was a search closed off to the public