A - The murder of TYLEE was committed for remuneration or the promise of remuneration - YES
B - The murder of JJ was committed for remuneration or the promise of remuneration - YES
C - The murder of TAMMY was committed for remuneration or the promise of remuneration - YES
D - The murder of TYLEE was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel - YES
E - The murder of JJ was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel - YES
F - The murder of TAMMY was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel - YES
G - By the murders... the defendant exhibited utter disregard for human life. - YES
H - The defendant, by his conduct... has exhibited a propensity to commit murder which will probably constitute a continuing threat to society. - YES
The mitigating circumstances are NOT compelling enough to make the imposition of the death penalty unjust.
Boyce was kind enough to present a laymen's explanation: "The jury has made a finding that it would be appropriate to impose the death penalty."