Good grief, that’s laughable.She’s referring to the automatic suggestions offered by Safari when you start typing in a search phrase. They look like the photos attached.
View attachment 510337View attachment 510338
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good grief, that’s laughable.She’s referring to the automatic suggestions offered by Safari when you start typing in a search phrase. They look like the photos attached.
View attachment 510337View attachment 510338
The bumper was wet, then covered in snow, perhaps the glass pieces were frozen in the grooved surface?When cars are towed, they generally are higher up in the front than in the rear. FInding it hard to believe all this glass didn't fall off in transport. JMO
The lack of EDS data is a big win for the defense-
Then I don’t understand why “how long to die in cold” would show up twice (at 2:27 and 6:24) on the defense’s chart instead of just once at the 2:27 mark since they both occur when same tab is active again?
When cars are towed, they generally are higher up in the front than in the rear. FInding it hard to believe all this glass didn't fall off in transport. JMO
The bumper was wet, then covered in snow, perhaps the glass pieces were frozen in the grooved surface?
I don’t think it would matter much. LE normally uses its own people on the payroll with the correct expertise/training rather than pay extra for outsiders. The defense gets to cross him and bring in their own expert to rebut him. adversarial trials are the fairest way to reach judgement IMO.
This vehicle was towed on a flatbed.When cars are towed, they generally are higher up in the front than in the rear. FInding it hard to believe all this glass didn't fall off in transport. JMO
The CW apparently is not realizing that continuing to point out that there was glass on the bumper that doesn’t match the cocktail glass is only emphasizing the idea of planted evidence.I believe the SUV was towed on a flatbed, although it would still have been driven up a ramp.
However, the forensic scientist from the crime lab already establish that the glass on the bumper did not come from John's drinking glass. Why is this witness still talking about it?
Yeah…notice how none of the suggestions are misspelled…Good grief, that’s laughable.
The CW apparently is not realizing that continuing to point out that there was glass on the bumper that doesn’t match the cocktail glass is only emphasizing the idea of planted evidence.
Because otherwise why would Karen have had any glass on the bumper?
Didn't one of the cops testify that only ONE lane had been plowed?View attachment 510341
I added yellow and green highlights to this photo for clarity - makes it easier to see exact locations at first glance. The red arrows in the original are hard to see.