MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
If her vehicle has a safety sensor to stop from hitting something (connected to the rear camera system?), wouldn't there be data on that as well?
Yes. And the defense alleged pretrial the safety system logged zero impacts or collisions.

This guy also confirmed there is a camera that will take pictures after impacts (I’m not sure the exact word he used) and there were none on her car.
 
None of those pieces of glass on the bumper matched the cocktail glass.
This needs to be stated 10 times per day so that people don’t miss this important fact.
She gave a scientific answer that the defense attorney skillfully used to imply that meant the glass "stood alone" implying it came from some third party. But that is not exactly what she said. She did say there was no physical match to the cocktail glass (jigsaw puzzle fit) but she also said there were physical matches to the glass on the ground outside the home. It is entirely possible for the glass on the bumper to be able to physically match the glass on the ground and for neither sample not to have an edge that matches anything on the cocktail glass or other fragments and for it still to have come from that cocktail glass. The entire mass of the glass was not recovered.

 
So wait, did I read that correctly? We’ve gone from she hit JOK at 24 mph to she hit JOK at 97 mph?
Edit: Going the distance of 94 feet at 24 mph on a road probably becoming sloppy seems really risky, let alone dangerous

With the vehicle’s speed and distance, in addition to being intoxicated, would she have been able to properly step on the breaks stop her from reversing her vehicle onto the lawn and as a result, into JO’s prone figure thus causing further harm? Would she have been able to maintain control if her car started to swerve or possibly hit the mailbox, the curb again or another vehicle? What about the risk of crashing if she drives or slides through intersection due to driving such a distance in reverse?
 
Last edited:
@BienickWCVB

Paul says tis chart shows Read's vehicle travelled just over 97 miles per hour in reverse. Says this data is "consistent with a pedestrian strike."

View attachment 510351

I have a very hard time believing that nobody heard the engine revving, saw any skid marks, etc... plus the fact that there are no time stamps make this whole report suspect. 97 mph in reverse would have left a much bigger "crime" scene than there was. JOK would have been in much worse shape than he was.
IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
133
Guests online
3,124
Total visitors
3,257

Forum statistics

Threads
602,284
Messages
18,138,271
Members
231,300
Latest member
DSMEITH1
Back
Top