The article linked said what will be covered.
Great Post and I 1000% agree with it !!!
I think a big issue is that juries want to believe that LE arrest people for good reason. They want to believe there is actual evidence linking this person to this crime, not that this is a random person plucked off the witness list.
Well, I have lots of questions about the D's competence when it comes to some documents. They accidentally sent important legal documents to the wrong person in their phone log. And of course they left important photos and documents unsupervised and out in the open, allowing them to be stolen and publicly distributed.
I don't think either of them is lying.“So maybe they want to have the hearing to transfer first, before going to SCOIN?”
You answered yourself. I believe 100% they have the “goods.” Their priority is to get RA out of prison where he does NOT belong, to give him the opportunity to be closer to his family and counsel and to regain or maintain his mental health after languishing for NO GOOD REASON in a prison for many months longer than he should have been.
Can’t wait to see who is lying, Tobe or JG! We’ll likely see more lying. This case is FULL of lies and subterfuge and not by the defense.
JMHO
What other people were more likely? Were any of them shown to be and admitted to be up on the bridge, with the girls, wearing the same type clothing as BG, at the time of the kidnapping?
Baston refused to come out of his cell in order to be transferred to Court where he was supposed to testify to all the horrible Odin things and mistreatment happening to RA. Maybe he's just a letter writing kind of inmate instead of one who would actually take the stand. IDK
So says the Defense, but they say a lot of things that are suspect IMO. Judge Gull ordered Baston's subpoena and transportation to Court. It is not her job to physically get him there. It's IDOC's and LE's.
It would be the second OA if the Defense wanted to push the issue to the SCOIN, which is comical to me. Baston is a convicted child SO serving 40 years, I think he'd be less than credible and if he won't leave his cell and won't testify they can't physically force him. Curious though if his testimony is sooo important to RA's case, why has the D allowed it sit on the back burner until now?? It's not, the D just needs ammo.
Not going to happen IMO.
Denied - JMO
And I'd bet they sit around patting each other on the back how brilliant these legal moves are. LOL
The Defense and their hijinks have stolen any dignity and thoughts of Abby and Libby, the real victims unfortunately. The families of these girls are also needlessly suffering because of them.I see it more of having the last word for some, regardless of being right or wrong.
I really do wish Abby and Libby could go back to front and center.
I don't think either of them is lying.
Delphi murder suspect's attorneys plan to call Judge Gull as a witness
The thinly veiled discontent between the Delphi murder suspect's attorneys, the judge and the prosecutor is summarized in a Tuesday filing.www.jconline.com
"Allen's attorneys say they plan to call Judge Frances Gull to testify to the truthfulness of a Carroll County Sheriff's Office report.
Chief Deputy Tobe Leazenby allegedly told a deputy in March 2023 that Gull gave permission to ignore Allen's subpoena for an inmate to be brought to court to testify about Allen's abusive treatment in prison.
But in Gull's May 31 order, she wrote, "The decision by the deputy to leave without the witness was his and was not directed by the court."
OK, it said "Chief Deputy Tobe Leazenby allegedly told a deputy " something over a year ago?
At least that was the Deputy's memory of it and his interpretation of it, during a difficult time with an obstinate inmate.
Who knows how accurate the memory was or the wording was?
The judge said the court did not 'DIRECT' anyone to leave without the witness. That could have been true while at the same time the statement of the Deputies could have been true and correct.
If the inmate was strongly defiant and refusing to go onto the transport, and the Chief Deputy spoke to Judge G and said 'He will not comply without physical force--I think we have to leave him here" and the Judge said OK---Does that mean 'SHE DIRECTED HIM to leave without the witness?" I don't think so.
The Chief Deputy is the person in charge of the DOC and the inmate transport process. If he decided that he could not safely get an inmate to comply, that is up to his discretion.
I think she could have agreed with him that he couldn't hogtie the witness in order to get him on the bus, without that meaning she DIRECTED him to leave the inmate behind.
There is a big difference between directing someone to do something and simply agreeing with someone else's decision.
The Deputy Chief may have rightfully believed that she gave 'him permission' to bring the transport with the other inmates to court and leave him behind because he was not compliant.
I don't think either of them is lying.
In real juris-world, Judges do NOT do give unclear orders re: transfers responding to subpoenas and/or misreport judicial decisions to Defense and Prosecution. One of these parties (Judge/LE) is obfuscating. Facts will be determined via testimony. There's no room here for excuse-making.I don't think either of them is lying.
Delphi murder suspect's attorneys plan to call Judge Gull as a witness
The thinly veiled discontent between the Delphi murder suspect's attorneys, the judge and the prosecutor is summarized in a Tuesday filing.www.jconline.com
"Allen's attorneys say they plan to call Judge Frances Gull to testify to the truthfulness of a Carroll County Sheriff's Office report.
Chief Deputy Tobe Leazenby allegedly told a deputy in March 2023 that Gull gave permission to ignore Allen's subpoena for an inmate to be brought to court to testify about Allen's abusive treatment in prison.
But in Gull's May 31 order, she wrote, "The decision by the deputy to leave without the witness was his and was not directed by the court."
OK, it said "Chief Deputy Tobe Leazenby allegedly told a deputy " something over a year ago?
At least that was the Deputy's memory of it and his interpretation of it, during a difficult time with an obstinate inmate.
Who knows how accurate the memory was or the wording was?
The judge said the court did not 'DIRECT' anyone to leave without the witness. That could have been true while at the same time the statement of the Deputies could have been true and correct.
If the inmate was strongly defiant and refusing to go onto the transport, and the Chief Deputy spoke to Judge G and said 'He will not comply without physical force--I think we have to leave him here" and the Judge said OK---Does that mean 'SHE DIRECTED HIM to leave without the witness?" I don't think so.
The Chief Deputy is the person in charge of the DOC and the inmate transport process. If he decided that he could not safely get an inmate to comply, that is up to his discretion.
I think she could have agreed with him that he couldn't hogtie the witness in order to get him on the bus, without that meaning she DIRECTED him to leave the inmate behind.
There is a big difference between directing someone to do something and simply agreeing with someone else's decision.
The Deputy Chief may have rightfully believed that she gave 'him permission' to bring the transport with the other inmates to court and leave him behind because he was not compliant.
I don't think either of them is lying.
Not by a long shot MODo we smell a “Checkmate?”
It’s about time! Or, should I say “It’s WAY overdue?”Gull on Friday scheduled a three-day hearing set to begin July 30 in the case of Richard Allen, 51, of Delphi.
...
Updated: Jun 21, 2024 / 05:52 PM EST
Judge in Delphi murders case schedules 3-day hearing
Judge Frances Gull has scheduled a new hearing in the Delphi murders case. Gull on Friday scheduled a three-day hearing.www.wishtv.com
