Tealgrove
#Where Is Summer? #Gannon Is My Hero
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,154
- Reaction score
- 48,775
So? Your point would be?Perhaps he worked all day and supported her.
So? Your point would be?Perhaps he worked all day and supported her.
Don't AA and SH share custody? While custodial interference appears to be properly charged because AA failed to return the child per the agreed-upon schedule, I don't think he can accurately be termed a "non-custodial" parent right now. I'm not defending his actions but at times we seem to be morphing into a different sets of facts about the entire situation.<modsnip>
A missing child absolutely warrants a raid if LE has a reason to suspect family members may be involved or at a minimum, hiding evidence. It doesn’t matter if it’s a “non-custodial” parent that’s not returned a child. How many cases do we see a week where NCP take off with a child and/or harm them? It’s happening all the time. It doesn’t make this child’s disappearance any less important.
If my NCP ex did this to me with my daughter I’d absolutely be telling LE to turn the world upside down to find her. It’s cases like this that are exactly why my child’s NCP and his girlfriend will never be around my child without me.
They share custody. However once he failed to return Seraya on agreed day & time he would be considered to be the non custodial parent, at that point he has committed a custodial interference offence.Don't AA and SH share custody? While custodial interference appears to be properly charged because AA failed to return the child per the agreed-upon schedule, I don't think he can accurately be termed a "non-custodial" parent right now. I'm not defending his actions but at times we seem to be morphing into a different sets of facts about the entire situation.
MOO
I'm not sure it works quite like that. At this point, he is charged with custodial interference.They share custody. However once he failed to return Seraya on agreed day & time he would be considered to be the non custodial parent, at that point he has committed a custodial interference offence.
I'd never defend his actions either, it was an incredibly stupid thing to do, as I've stated previously.Don't AA and SH share custody? While custodial interference appears to be properly charged because AA failed to return the child per the agreed-upon schedule, I don't think he can accurately be termed a "non-custodial" parent right now. I'm not defending his actions but at times we seem to be morphing into a different sets of facts about the entire situation.
MOO
I don't know.<modsnip>
A missing child absolutely warrants a raid if LE has a reason to suspect family members may be involved or at a minimum, hiding evidence. It doesn’t matter if it’s a “non-custodial” parent that’s not returned a child. How many cases do we see a week where NCP take off with a child and/or harm them? It’s happening all the time. It doesn’t make this child’s disappearance any less important.
If my NCP ex did this to me with my daughter I’d absolutely be telling LE to turn the world upside down to find her. It’s cases like this that are exactly why my child’s NCP and his girlfriend will never be around my child without me.
I don't know.
I feel as though there should be more than mere suspicion to warrant a raid on the home and persons of family members. I think there should be some sort of probable cause that the family members were actually involved in some way.
No one was arrested, and we still don't know where AA, NC, and little Seraya are so it doesn't appear as though LE found much of value.
MOO, but I think we need to protect our 4th Amendment right to not allow unreasonable searches and seizures.
I think media attention makes LE jumpy, but has anyone seen the search warrant? I'd like to know how they justified the raid. Did they suspect the Aungs were harboring fugitives right there in the home? Did they have cause to think the Aung's were orchestrating (and paying for) the disappearance?
LE has come out and said they don't think Seraya is in any danger.
I hope they find her very soon and return her to Samara, but I also want to see our rights upheld.
You make a good point about it being a raid of "AA's" home if he lived there.Do we know WHERE AA had been living? Possibly he was living there so it was HIS home being raided. Either way, LE obviously secured probable cause for search and seizure.
Has LE said Seraya isn't in any danger? I don't recall that... but maybe to diffuse the situation? It's best for everyone if AA comes forward voluntarily and without force...
The family statement gives probable cause as far as I'm concerned. Because it reveals foreknowledge, implies support, and exposes motive -- to keep Seraya away permanently. That's A LOT.
If LE has uncovered additional links, whoa.
Vehicle telematics, wiretaps --
I don't think the raid was a fishing expedition.
JMO
You make a good point about it being a raid of "AA's" home if he lived there.
Early on, LE said they had no reason to suspect Seraya was in danger but that AA broke the law by not returning her at the appointed time.
Maybe it wasn't a fishing expedition, but searching their bodies? That means they had to suspect family members were complicit. But, no arrests.
I just want to see the search warrant to find out what could have made them go that route.
I doubt LE uncovered anything substantial because Seraya is still gone. Had they found evidence that the family was supporting or helping the runaways, they would have been able to find them by now. For example, had they found a burner phone, they could have traced the calls it made. Maybe they have a stingray set up in the area.
I just feel that had they found anything of value, Seraya would be home now.
Maybe.It may not be so simple.
Especially if they've managed to leave the country.
JMO
There are specific steps LE must take before entering a home. Are you suggesting LE is not following those steps? I have seen nothing that indicates this isn't anything other than a lawful investigation.You make a good point about it being a raid of "AA's" home if he lived there.
Early on, LE said they had no reason to suspect Seraya was in danger but that AA broke the law by not returning her at the appointed time.
Maybe it wasn't a fishing expedition, but searching their bodies? That means they had to suspect family members were complicit. But, no arrests.
I just want to see the search warrant to find out what could have made them go that route.
I doubt LE uncovered anything substantial because Seraya is still gone. Had they found evidence that the family was supporting or helping the runaways, they would have been able to find them by now. For example, had they found a burner phone, they could have traced the calls it made. Maybe they have a stingray set up in the area.
I just feel that had they found anything of value, Seraya would be home now.
I agree. My understanding from msm reports is that LE executed a search warrant, which means they had to produce probable cause before a judge would sign it. That’s how our fourth amendment rights are protected.There are specific steps LE must take before entering a home. Are you suggesting LE is not following those steps? I have seen nothing that indicates this isn't anything other than a lawful investigation.
jmo