MiniMoo
JusticeForSome
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 396
- Reaction score
- 1,655
Seems, and I could be understanding it wrong, that the blood isn't through direct contact (contact on the same surface) with the vehicle like a person being hit by it."Indeed, the PFA laboratory managed to sequence a mixed nuclear DNA profile corresponding to a male human being, which is suitable for comparison, based on the results of the study carried out on eight samples taken from the Ford Ranger vehicle - belonging to the accused Carlos Pérez and María Victoria Caillava - with a swab on the surfaces that had tested positive for the luminol test, which is used to detect blood stains.
However, the Public Prosecutor's Office reported that this result does not allow us to conclude that the origin of this DNA trace comes from a blood stain, or from a trace caused by contact or another type of fluid on the same surface.
In this context, the Forensic Medical Institute of the TSJ of Corrientes was required to carry out complementary analyses of that sample."
OKAY, color me confused....are they saying [bbm] the result of the DNA profile found on the Ford Ranger is NOT Loan's?
OR that the blood samples are not adequate somehow?
It is how it is translated maybe.