grannygates
On Time Out
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 8,686
It’s bad and there’s so much it’s hard to sum up quickly lolThey did “lose it” in the sense it is not available to the defense to review. This is pretty bad imo. You’d think they’d hold on to all things such as video interviews until someone is locked away and the keys been tossed in the Thames!
Apparently in August 2017, they realized veryimportant dates of interviews (I believe the 5 days after the murders) were completely deleted and the remaining videos had no sound and they just… Did nothing. Didn’t recall witnesses or make a list of who was interviewed or send it to the ISP lab to see if it could be recovered. They didn’t even make a report about it until the defense asked about it in 2023.
IMO This means (to me) that not one person in that 6 month period reviewed, watched or copied an interview to notice that the audio wasn’t recording? No one copied any interviews taken within the 5 days after the murders for a report.
Then there’s all the 3rd party evidence that was missing, “deleted”,or they claim to have never collected, and the defense has in turn gone out and collected from retired LE officers or random people in the world who retained a copy of the evidence they gave to the police that the police deleted. All MOO