m00c0w
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,474
- Reaction score
- 6,777
The hood would be below her injury if she was on her back and the hood was under her neck, as hoods tend to wind up when you’re on your back…I think that the most important thing we learned in the full testimony is that this cell phone expert was only tasked by the prosecution with reporting on the FEB13 cell phone extraction. So as he was not tasked with a FEB14 extraction, he could state that the phone did not turn on again in his report because his report is only FEB13.
He did confirm that the phone was powered on again at 4:33 AM and there were 14 messages received on the device at that time.
You will also note that the expert indicated in their full testimony that the blood saturation on Abby was the hood of her hoodie. There was no blood below her injury. That’s a very crucial detail for the podcast to include in their episode.
MOO
<modsnip: Image removed. Even "stock" photos need a link so we all know where they came from>
Random stock photo for demonstration purposes…
Last edited by a moderator: