TTF14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,734
- Reaction score
- 72,951
I don't think it's really working so hard to file a simple motion.. seems short and to the point. It is his job to present as clear of a case as he can so that it will be easy to follow for the jury. The defense will try to muddy all the waters so the jury is confused because they don't have any solid evidence to exclude their client from the bridge or from the trail from 130-330. They want the jury to be confused, the state wants it to be clear. This trial should not be going through every single thing LE did to investigate this case. It would take months to do that and it comes back to having zero to do with RA, who is on trial. Jurors have lives too and this shouldn't take 3 months just so the defense can drag it on calling everyone that ever was looked at to the stand and trying to pin it on them.
They aren't doing that, thankfully. Only the ones that make sense based on the staging of the crime scene. For example, we haven't heard the DT mention DN even once, have we? He was looked it. Or TB, CE, BJC, or PE. All of them were "looked at" and the defense is not trying to "pin it on them."
Only the ones involved in activities closely related to how the crime scene was staged. (ETA: And allegedly confessed to a sibling, had ties to one of the victims through a dating relationship, etc.)
IMO MOO
Last edited: