Search results

Ms. Clay, please don't twist what I said. The tabloid producers didn't say this. I believe Asher, the boss of the person who administered Mike’s questioning, knows more about the facts than you do regarding this case. The tabloid producers didn’t say it. So do you also think Stu and Ms McCall...

I agree. But my point was that minimizing the whereabouts of Dusty and people who were associated and facts surrounding him and Suzie's car shouldn't be dismissed as nothing. Especially when their relationship may have been the start of some dangerous people associated with GJ3 entering Suzie's...

It’s not a tabloid show saying it. It was the literal lead investigator. The show was the medium. This wasn’t edited. And he was lead investigator when your husband’s questioning happened. You’re saying Asher wouldn’t have seen the same documents, from 1992-1994, that you possess? Why is...

I believe Mike when he says they were at Community Center. I believe that Dusty started his night there. I just want to know that if he did pass out on Commercial and end up at Mike and his sister's later or not? And why does Asher say different? Dustin's relationship with Streeter was the...

Have tried. Over 20 times over the years. He isn't responding to me. Would love to hear from him. SPD doesn't care to discuss details of the case. It's an ongoing investigation, you know. So we're left with what they say publicly. And our own research.

Asher says different. And it wouldn’t be just him. They questioned almost everyone at that concert. If Asher is wrong, why would he say it? Why would he mention the car? No motive for him to do it. Even if he has a weird hard-on for driving a wedge between the families. I am not trying to be...

Why would Mike’s documents matter then since Asher is a cop just like the ones Mike was questioned by? They all were the same team.

I do want to prove people are lying because it speaks to possible motives. And if Mike is honest then WHY are cops lying? Not so hard to get what I’m after. Never let truth be swept up like it’s nothing. My interest is in justice for the women. Mike Clay said something different than the cops...

Because I want the truth first. Cops say something different than Mike. It’s new information that Dusty was passed out on a Commercial street and not where Mike said. It’s best to rule out all possible deflection tactics. I’m not the only one to point this out. Why is it so hard to demand...

The truth. Then if they are lying I want to know why. That’s all. Nothing proven yet.

No doubt that’s his technique. Apparent since day 1 in the papers and on 48 Hours. No doubt your aunt could have known anything about your friends. However, his agenda and wedging aside, that does not mean he was wrong about Recla’s alibi... Separate issues.

No. The show didn’t last until 3am. Bar close was much earlier in those days. Plus noise ordinances. Your husband said he was at Mike’s on the couch after poker after helping with band equipment. Want a screenshot of the post? I just want the truth of where he was. Was he passed out on...

Shouldn’t make assumptions. Again, did Asher lie about the car and Dustin’s alibi? Mentioning Commercial Street is awfully specific. We’re to believe he’s just a senile and Barney Fife? Yes he said things about Bartt. But all he did was say what someone told him. Not defending his hard-on for...

I'm sorry but you have zero proof of this.

Your only proof is the word of a wife of a suspect. AKA not proof.

Having once rented a house on Portland St. not far from where the women lived, I can tell you that tons and tons of work vans are used in this town at all hours. The paper boy could have seen anything. And how are we sure multiple cars weren't used? The neighborhood next to 1717 Delmar was...

Asher's health has nothing to do with what was said. Was Suzie's car used or not? It's a very important piece of information. Are we supposed to believe detective Asher, only a few years removed from retirement has such poor cognitive abilities that suspects in the case are the truthful ones...

Yes, I find this odd too. You should definitely be getting answers from SPD about this matter.

You should sue SPD in civil court. Building a Case to Sue the Police: Difficult But Not Impossible Here's a link about it. You could sue them for misconduct. Especially if you have proof of your interactions from the earlier days up to now. Your energy in doing so would not be wasted. At any...

I don't hold him in high regard. I just said a few posts before that he treats Bartt wrongly. I'm stating facts that he was a cop until he retired. The SPD hold him in high regard. Not me. And it doesn't matter how he treats Bartt or shows favoritism with McCalls over him. Only the truth...