Any statement that the Supreme Court threw out should not even be considered in making out a circumstantial case IMO. Actually it is not even IMO - i don't think legally jt can even be done. it is not my opinion it was faulty; the italian legal system said it was. Problem here is they did the...
Because each side has a different burden, we cannot view statements about the evidence as meaning the same for both sides. IMO, A statement that there is no AK or RS DNA in that murder room is very telling and at least raises doubts as to whether they were in that room. For people who believe in...
I think JA did it, I have no reasonable doubt there, nor do I have reasonable doubt about Casey or Scott Peterson. I actually think Casey 's lawyer did a good job in closing argument showing what RD is- it is not probably did it, or possibly, it is you really believe they did it without any...
It just seems to me that some posts (on both sides) are stating statements on those sites as fact rather than opinion. Probably most of us know which ones are pro guilt or pro innocent and know to treat such statements w a grain of salt. Interpretation of evidence in those sites is all opinion...
The defense does not need to answer every question but the prosecution needs to prove guilt
Who knows what was said in the confusion? Who knows what she overheard? How do we know what she saw? Or maybe even guessed?
Moreover, maybe there is a scenario where she came home to the cottage...
It is opinion that an article in the mainstream press is false and misleading. Once one piece is let in, that gets to be a slippery slope especially when the source pf the critique has an obvious slant. Can any website critiquing any news story in the main stream press be allowed to be posted...
Moreover, I was also referring to the question asked before by someone asking for both sides to state their doubts about their own position, to see the case as the other side sees it.
So far no pro guilty people have done that, I was just pointing that out.
And it is not correct that all of...
<modsnip> Do people think it was cleaned and if so how could you clean it and still leave the DNA (low copy)? Do people think that we should use low copy DNA testing as evidence? Or do people not believe the knife is the murder weapon but they still think the other evidence is strong enough to...
So far it is only two Pro innocent people even answering the question.
I don't think anyone on either side of this case can see every single piece of evidence supporting their side without any trace of reasonable doubt. Pro guilt may think on the whole it shows guilt beyond a reasonable...
Just a question, why are we allowed to cite to clearly pro guilt websites (and likewise I have also seen pro innocent ones too?) I could see citing to court documents on such sites, but I thought we were not allowed to cite to blogs. It seems like people throw around comments on those sites (on...
It is my understanding that the prosecution does not contest that the knife wounds from the DNA knife do not match. Their solution is that there is some missing bigger knife that made the wounds.
So they think the DNA knife was used to kill MR yet it left no blood on the blade nor does it even...
Well, it seems like no one cares to answer this on the guilty side (nor explain how an allege stabbing weapon could have neither blood nor match the wounds) but I will answer this from the non guilty side.
I think her entire statement - if it was admissible, which it is not - is weird. If that...
Key difference : RG DNA was all over that room, on body, etc, AK and RS DNA is not in murderroom- there is no proof they stabbed anyone nor is there proof beyond a reasonable doubt they were even in that cottage that night.
As I reiterated many times, of course you do not need a murder...
If your friend was murdered and you believed the killer was on the loose, as a single female would you troll around Perugia at night. I would not, RS could not go bc I think a class or something and Ak did not want to go alone
Would you go somewhere where you know everyone would gawk and read...
Who cares which is bigger or smaller. If the testing was done by a method not supported by the scientific community it should be thrown out. No court is going to want to uphold that precedent that unreliable DNA testing can be used to take away someone's liberties.
They at least needed to...
I have just been writing in this forum for the past week and have asked this question at least a half dozen times but no one answers that.
Moreover, how could something be the murder weapon yet the wounds not match? Even if a second knife was used, it would still match some wounds.
What...
Why isn't it blood? And it was low copy DNA which is not considered reliable by the scientific community. Why would one want a system that considers such things admissible? I might repeat - it is not blood
There should have been MK low copy DNA all over that knife. Why wasn't it there? The fact...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.