Heads shouldn't hurt trying to get a simple timeline of who was there and when. That's the point I've been trying to drive home. The timelines are out there, you have to be willing to look. IMO and :)
IMO If you study the timeline and who was where at what time, there is no way a few didn't see each other.
BG is not a phantom. IMO
No one is. IMO
Study the timeline. IMO
Write it down if you have to, draw color coded stick people. Or seek out those who have already done this work. IMO
FSG reports to DG that he heard a couple arguing at the bridge. So so important is this was at the crime scene and the time of the murders, IMO what FSG heard is absolutely relevant and vital. IMO and speculating, FSG could have absolutely heard BG and the girls and the arguing couple simply...
The biggest case in the state and LE takes 6 months to release a sketch. Why? Because "witnesses" couldn't agree? And why couldn't they agree? Of course someone lied regarding the first released sketch or they wouldn't have released the second one.
JMO IMO MOO et al
Sure, cause no one expects a double murder to be happening.
Also as someone pointed out earlier we really don’t know exactly what he reported he heard. LE repeatedly says they have a lot of evidence. We can hope this witness gave vital info.
Correct, family has confirmed the arguing couple statement.
We just don't know who the arguing couple wasn't a couple at all but BG and the girls, being that it was at the same time and the same location as the crime.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.