Search results

Also, did we establish if they're married yet? Wouldn't marriage protect them from testifying against one another? Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I believe they said she doesn't yet. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Oh, believe me, I agree that they are shady and have made some really mind boggling decisions. I have just seen this happen before, like with the Maura Murray case, where the police name some a POI or suspect, and all of these wild theories (ie not really having any credibility behind them)...

Yeah, I think I misunderstood what he was to them. I thought he was representing them in a legal capacity [emoji85] Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Or because the police say she's a suspect, people state she didn't love her son? Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I guess I feel kind of icky how this thread is heading. She is a person of suspicion now, but hasn't been charged or convicted. Maybe she's innocent and they're doing this to force information out of her. I just think talking about her medical history and making up what sealed court cases could...

Yes! As much as I want information, I felt kind of weird knowing info like that of someone who actually hasn't even been charged or convicted yet. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

All good points. I was quite honestly a bit confused as to what his official capacity was in this case. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

That was my first thought. I really would love if he was alive someplace...thought what kind of parents would agree to lie and stage an abduction? Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

So, does that mean that, legally, you can disclose information for lack of payment? What about the whole "give a lawyer a dollar before you tell him anything" concept? Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

He said he volunteered and they offered to kick him down some donation money. I'm not sure that means they agreed to pay him for his services (not arguing, just theorising). Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I agree with Fireweed. He stated he likes the analyst title better, but that doesn't mean he's not a conspiracy theorist. As I've mentioned, he has been useful by way of doing his own digging, talking to Fred, talking to people in the case; however, his own page does come off as eccentric and...

I don't know what to make of this. Some is interesting, but some seems kind of like assuming. Just because you have your tubes tied doesn't mean you staged an abduction to do a secret adoption. The adoptive parents would need all of little DeOrr's paperwork. I do believe him that these people...

I would NEVER leave my kid in a situation like that, and I guess that's what bothered me from the start. I read in the beginning something along the lines of "we thought he was with ggp and ggp thought he was with us." It, IMO, goes against your instincts as a parent. And even if the parents...

All they've released is "changing stories." They're not showing their cards yet. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I meant as in not mentioning them as suspects here. We were instructed by the thread runner not to accuse them, that they were to be considered as victims. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I think we gave his parents a pass because LE was so adamant initially that they were innocent and we were told they were not to be treated as suspects. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Someone explain the press release. Now the parents are suspects. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I am so confused at this point. Klein's statements always make me scratch my head. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Oh, totally. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk