Search results

time for me to contribute a bizarre and improbable theory I just thought of: what if there was 1 accomplice/other perp w/ DW in the house (who is not a known player/hasn't been discussed/i have no idea who this would be) and after the commission of the crime, DW and this unknown other person...

yes, the Wire is what I was thinking of when I saw that white bucket, too. creepy connection.

ITA with your assessment of the convoy.

Thanks for adding this. I meant to include that in my post but forgot...I think if there is anyone in custody besides DW, this is actually the most likely scenario: that they are being held for other offenses while LE is gathering evidence and building a case.

I'm not saying I necessarily think there have been additional arrests, I'm just saying it is possible MSM wouldn't report additional arrests because it's possible MSM is not aware of them...LE doesn't have to share news of arrests with the media, AFAIK. There is a lot of public interest in this...

It is possible others have been arrested for involvement in this crime but their arrests haven't been reported in MSM, which means we wouldn't know about them. But just because it is not general knowledge/ is not being reported, doesn't mean that arrests haven't been made.

yes, as long as he is locked up, he is not a risk to the public of course but I imagine it will be even more difficult for the victims' families and friends the longer he drags on this case.

I agree with you in thinking there was more than 1 person involved. And of course I think it's a possibility that the perp(s) were known to someone in the S family (maybe SS even knew/remembered DW from when DW worked at AIW or maybe one of DW's accomplices worked for the construction company...

I have no doubt you're right that PS wouldn't want his mom hurt and he does seem to have been a very brave kid. However, AS was an adult and PS was a 10 year old kid so I still see PS as more of the one that the killer(s) would use to leverage control over the adults. I do agree with you that it...

I believe yes, SS would have done anything for AS too but by controlling the child, PS, the killer(s) thereby controlled everyone else as the child was a bargaining chip not only for SS but for AS too. The killer(s) knew all the adults would do whatever they asked if they threatened/hurt PS.

Oh, you could be right. I don't know really. A lot of the people we're talking about but not really talking about since we can't say their names have similar names and it gets confusing.

I like this theory of another involved party possibly already being in custody on unrelated charges. Perhaps this is the same person who threatened to burn AIW after being fired...if this proves to be true, it seems like a very simple explanation, really, at least looking at this from the...

thank you. I did as you instructed. Here is what I found: charges of: poss paraphernalia driving without a license failure to stop at stop sign line not wearing seatbelt DUI, negligent driving, speeding 5 separate cases for traffic violations (all filed under case type: traffic)...

i understand all the posting vaguely to stay within the TOS but can someone please share what it is that you are talking about here:)...without explicitly stating anyone's name (because I can just assume it is a relative of DW and leave it at that), is it OK to share the details of the case to...

i have no clue whether any of this info about SM privacy fits into this case, i was merely stating what i know about fb privacy settings because that was being discussed in the previous thread. i tend to agree w you that the S family likely was not reading JWs posts.

yes, this is what i was saying. you are correct there is no way to keep public posts limited to certain friends. not sure what the relevance of this info was in the first place! (something about whether or not SS may have been disapproving of JW's fb posts, I think?) but i do unfortunately (due...

yes, but you cannot customize who sees a public post. his posts had to be public for us (non-friends) to see them. and for public posts, you cannot custom select which of your friends see them. what i was saying is there is no way to keep one of your fb friends from seeing a *public* post unless...

Just wanted to say, in response to a discussion from the last thread: on Facebook, if your post is public (which JW's would have been if websleuthers could see them), then you cannot restrict them to certain people or block certain people from seeing them unless you have blocked that person...

You're right that ultimately all that matters is that he did lie, not how he worded his lies. My point was that we don't know 100% for sure that he deliberately lied rather than omitting or misrepresenting some facts because he was flustered/stressed. That distinction does matter because to me...

Thank you!