Search results

Is it any wonder he was pulled into JB's and KC's drama? They all have a lot in common.

Thanks for the clarification. That still doesn't change my opinion of this juror though :crazy:

That, and other things.

So where did he get the idea that KC was "likable, intelligent and articulate"? Whether or not he said the actual word makes no difference to me. It all means the same thing.

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh: Thanks for the laugh. I really needed that!

This is what I'm having the most difficulty with comprehending. They were told that, because this was a circumstantial evidence case, their decision would rely heavily on the credibility of the witnesses, yet they chose to believe only the witnesses who LIED UNDER OATH and as well as the...

EXACTLY!! They supplied JB with everything he needed, even the 'drowning' theory. Cindy never saw that ladder up to the pool or the gate open. The 'someone' who suggested that Caylee might have drowned in the pool (surprise, surprise) was Cindy! She was hoping that would be an "open" for KC if...

What a really good point. I must confess, I never picked up on it either and I've been following this case since day 1.

I think they could all relate to JB on his level. JA was way over their heads in the intelligence department and I think that intimidated a lot of them. It almost looks like they added a little disclaimer of their own to this trial: "for entertainment purposes only". JB was the best entertainer.

I can't imagine that her life from here on out will be any semblance of "bella". I'm wondering about JB too and whether or not he'll continue with practicing (shady) law or go the route of Howard K. Stern and produce a reality TV show featuring his protegee. I can't imagine that he will cease...

It would be interesting to count how many times JB referred to KC as this "child". I'm still having trouble believing that 12 people could all be that gullible.

And add to that that they lowered her chair and surrounded her with really big people so she would look like the tiny, innocent "child" that everyone was beating up on. Disgusting

Good thing they weren't around when Susan Smith was on trial. They would have had everyone believing she was only taking the boys out for a moonlight swim when the car 'accidentally' rolled into the lake.

So the next time JB pats himself on the back and says "I saved a life today", he should be promptly corrected. JB didn't save KC's life. GA did!

I'm at a loss for words! How can this guy get away with saying he thinks KC is "likeable, bright and articulate". How would he know? This sounds like something he's heard someone else say.

Okay, so now I wish someone would ask him to explain where he gets this from, since the only thing he heard coming from her mouth was obscenities?

The last time I served on jury duty was a year and a half ago. It was a criminal case that was based on circumstantial evidence. Both the judge and the Prosecution said repeatedly "This is a CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE case. There is no DNA, no fingerprints, no blood, etc. etc. Your decision will be...

Oh how I wish..........

I don't think anyone on this jury wanted anyone to think they were incapable of understanding the instructions to the "letter". Mr. Foreman talks as if he understood the "letter of the law" perfectly. JF, in "bio" said she likes to be perceived as "intelligent". There you have it!

Was this the guy who said the jury had to "follow the letter of the law"? I wish someone would ask him what letter he thinks that is. I also wish someone would point out to these jurors that a) yes, you were supposed to "connect the dots"; b) the State does NOT have to prove HOW or WHY; c) the...