Steven30CA
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 0
omg i m watching the interview HES LYING.......... IT SMELLS FISHY. NO FACE PIC? He is ashamed of his verdict.......
This jury would say it could have been the sprinkers :crazy:
Juror #11 says they were asked to convict on a cause of death??? WTH???
CM said that. Juror #11 never said that. The foreman never said anything like that. The WS poster thought that Greta was quoting the foreman, but she was quoting CM. It was the same On the Record show last night. First she interviewed the jury foreman, and then CM.
MASON: What of know of Casey she an incredibly likeable person despite the lynch mob mentality on the street. To talk to her a just few minutes is to like her. She is very bright very articulate. She's got guts. She is as tough as they come.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-th...hose-who-have-threatened-jurors#ixzz1RwnDC4tA
Ya know, I'm so waiting for that. I expect there will be lots of trouble sooner than later. Sans the look when she couldn't get JB's attention in court that day. Wait till she's free and someone tries to withhold money or steer her in the right direction, (tell her what to do) THE SPITEFUL B*%#h will return with a vengeance.
There are alot of people who will pay dearly, including the A's. We'll see how much they all love her. :banghead:
By who????? This gets worse by the minute!Juror #11 says they were asked to convict on a cause of death??? WTH???
People's recent accusations about the jury are unfounded. Until there is actual proof that their votes were bought by the DT, that they are subpar in intelligence, didn't follow instructions, only listened to opening and closing statements, and made their decision on who smiled at them the most rather than weighing all the evidence before them, then I don't believe such opinions have a leg to stand on--although, of course, everyone is free to express them.
Correct... those things you listed, when looked at in isolation, do not prove murder. But when all the evidence is considered as a WHOLE, the picture is pretty clear. Unfortunately, this jury did exactly what LDB was afraid of -- they couldn't see the forest for the trees. And, nearly everyone I have come across that agrees with this verdict makes the same mistake.
He was "stunned" when the PT rested??? I swear, this jury would need a video of the crime to convict!
MOO
So juror 11 thought Casey looked sincere and that probably saved her (read: he thought she was pretty). A teacher working on his Masters of Education in Spec. Ed. sees a crying young woman with a dead child and thinks this is real but still finds her guilty of lying to police officers on four counts. Did the police think she looked sincere? They also probably thought she was pretty and trying pretty hard to dissuade them to search for Caylee and that got them pretty angry with her right away. Why was he so sympathetic to Casey? Why did he let this go? Would he have been so sympathetic to her if she weren't as attractive in a flag? JMO